Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 1;1(3):407-416.
doi: 10.9745/ghsp-d-13-00075.

Simulated clients reveal programmatic factors that may influence contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya

Affiliations

Simulated clients reveal programmatic factors that may influence contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya

Katherine Tumlinson et al. Glob Health Sci Pract. .

Abstract

A better understanding of the factors influencing use of family planning has the potential to increase contraceptive prevalence and improve the ability of women and their partners to freely choose the number and spacing of their children. Investigations into factors contributing to unmet need frequently rely on data collected using household surveys or interviews with family planning clients and providers. This research utilizes qualitative information resulting from simulated client visits to investigate programmatic barriers to contraceptive use in a sample of 19 health care facilities in Kisumu East District, a city in Western Kenya. Simulated client reports indicate deficiencies in provider competence as well as tenuous relations between providers and clients. In addition, simulated client data reveal occasional absences of providers during normal facility hours of operation and requests of informal fees for services. Trainings that address specific gaps in provider medical knowledge and counseling skills as well as client-provider relations may reduce programmatic barriers to contraceptive use. In addition, improved supervision and oversight at facilities may increase physical and financial access to services. Future research investigating provider motivations may illuminate root causes of programmatic barriers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: None declared.

References

    1. Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368(9549): 1810–1827 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen S. Promoting sexual and reproductive health advances maternal health. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2009; 12(2): 8–12 Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/12/2/gpr120208.pdf
    1. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, Ahn SY, Wang M, Makela SM, et al. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 2010;375(9726): 1609–1623 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60518-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). World Population Day–Six reasons to support family planning. News in Context [Internet]. Washington, DC: AGI; 2008. Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2008/07/09/
    1. The Population Reference Bureau (PRB). Family planning saves lives, 4th ed. Washington, DC: PRB; 2009

LinkOut - more resources