Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Sep;80(3):456-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 29.

Point-of-care testing for celiac disease has a low sensitivity in endoscopy

Affiliations
Observational Study

Point-of-care testing for celiac disease has a low sensitivity in endoscopy

Peter D Mooney et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is a common but underdiagnosed condition. A rapid point-of-care test (POCT) could reduce lead times and missed diagnoses.

Objective: To assess the utility of an immunoglobulin (Ig) A tissue transglutaminase (TTG) antibody POCT in an endoscopic setting.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: A single UK university hospital.

Patients: Patients presenting with suspected CD, known CD, and routine endoscopy for upper GI symptoms.

Interventions: All patients were tested with POCT, serum TTG, endomysial antibody (EMA), and upper GI endoscopy with duodenal biopsies at the same visit.

Main outcome measurements: Comparison was made with histology in all cases, with villous atrophy regarded as diagnostic of CD.

Results: A total of 576 patients (63.5% female, mean [± standard deviation] age 49.7 years [± 17.6 years]) were recruited. A total of 523 patients had no prior diagnosis of CD, and 53 patients had known CD coming for reassessment. A total of 117 patients were newly diagnosed with CD, and 82 were positively identified by the POCT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 70.1%, 96.6%, 85.4%, and 91.8%, respectively. In comparison, TTG and EMA both performed significantly better than the POCT. Sensitivity and specificity of TTG were 91.0% and 83.5%, respectively, and EMA were 83.8% and 97.5%, respectively. Of patients with known CD coming for reassessment, 26 had villous atrophy, and POCT results were positive in 16 (61.5%). There was poor agreement between POCT and standard serology.

Limitations: High pre-test probability of CD.

Conclusion: The performance of this POCT was disappointing compared with standard serology and cannot at present be recommended within the context of an endoscopy unit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms