Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130368.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0368. Print 2014 May 19.

How Darwinian is cultural evolution?

Affiliations

How Darwinian is cultural evolution?

Nicolas Claidière et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Darwin-inspired population thinking suggests approaching culture as a population of items of different types, whose relative frequencies may change over time. Three nested subtypes of populational models can be distinguished: evolutionary, selectional and replicative. Substantial progress has been made in the study of cultural evolution by modelling it within the selectional frame. This progress has involved idealizing away from phenomena that may be critical to an adequate understanding of culture and cultural evolution, particularly the constructive aspect of the mechanisms of cultural transmission. Taking these aspects into account, we describe cultural evolution in terms of cultural attraction, which is populational and evolutionary, but only selectional under certain circumstances. As such, in order to model cultural evolution, we must not simply adjust existing replicative or selectional models but we should rather generalize them, so that, just as replicator-based selection is one form that Darwinian selection can take, selection itself is one of several different forms that attraction can take. We present an elementary formalization of the idea of cultural attraction.

Keywords: cultural attraction; cultural evolution; culture; population thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Four nested explanatory frameworks.

References

    1. Aunger R. (ed.) 2000. Darwinizing culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Boyd R, Richerson P. 1988. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Cavalli-Sforza L, Feldman M. 1981. Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. - PubMed
    1. Dawkins R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Durham WH. 1991. Coevolution: genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources