[Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system]
- PMID: 24687519
- DOI: 10.1007/s00064-013-0271-2
[Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system]
Abstract
Objective: Restore primary center of rotation and reconstruct extensive bone defects in hip revision surgery with a modular off-label implant combined with antiprotrusion cage and metal augment, thus, achieving improved hip function.
Indications: Large segmental acetabular defects with nonsupportive columns (Paprosky type 3a and 3b) in cup loosening or Girdlestone situation. In case of pelvic discontinuity posterior column-plating is possible.
Contraindications: Persisting hip infection and severe systemic disorders impairing achievement of secondary stability through bony integration of metal augment.
Surgical technique: Posterolateral (if dorsal column plating) or other approach. Remove loose implant and granulation tissue with sufficient exposure of bleeding bone. Size acetabular defect with trial components of augment and appropriate antiprotrusio cage. Fixation of selected metal augment with screws. Fill additional acetabular defects with morsellized bone graft. Open a slot into the ischium to fix the distal flange of the cage. If necessary, bend both flanges according to patient's anatomy. Enter the ischium with distal flange and gradual impaction of the antiprotrusio ring. Final stabilization of the ring with several screws aiming at the posterior column or the acetabular dome. Inject cement between ring and augment to stabilize the construction and avoid metal wear. Final cement fixation of a polyethylene liner or a dual-mobility cup into the antiprotrusio ring. In pelvic discontinuity with major instability osteosynthesis of the dorsal column can be performed prior to cementation.
Postoperative management: Prophylaxis of periprosthetic infection, DVT and heterotopic ossification. Physical therapy with partial weight bearing (20 kp) for 6 weeks; in discontinuity initial wheel chair mobilization.
Results: Since 2008, 72 off-label implantations of a combined antiprotrusio cage and a Trabecular Metal™ Augment were performed. A total of 44 patients (46 operations) were investigated at 38.8 (36-51) months postoperatively. In all, 36 patients had a bone defect according to Paprosky type 3a/b and in 3/4 patients with pelvic discontinuity additional osteosynthesis was performed. The WOMAC score increased from 39.8 (8.7-75) points preoperatively to 57.9 (16.7-97.9) points at follow-up. Migration or failure of implant components was not observed. In 11 % of dislocations and 11 % periprosthetic infections surgical revision was necessary.
Similar articles
-
[Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Apr;26(2):126-40. doi: 10.1007/s00064-013-0270-3. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014. PMID: 24691908 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Jul;22(3):256-67. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-8025-x. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010. PMID: 20676820 German.
-
[Osteosynthesis and cup revision in periprosthetic acetabulum fractures using a Kocher-Langenbeck approach].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Apr;28(2):91-103. doi: 10.1007/s00064-015-0425-5. Epub 2015 Oct 16. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2016. PMID: 26475262 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Acetabular reconstruction using porous metallic material in complex revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1S):S53-S61. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 Aug 20. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 30138711
-
[Acetabular metastatic defect reconstruction using the modular revision support cup MRS-C].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Apr;36(2):145-156. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00834-6. Epub 2023 Nov 3. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2024. PMID: 37921888 Free PMC article. Review. German.
Cited by
-
[Arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia: Problem-oriented treatment strategies].Orthopade. 2015 Jul;44(7):497-8, 500-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3106-z. Orthopade. 2015. PMID: 25860120 Review. German.
-
[Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients].Chirurg. 2017 Feb;88(2):105-109. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0340-9. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 28054110 Review. German.
-
Managing periprosthetic fractures: perspectives on periprosthetic pelvic fractures.OTA Int. 2023 Mar 28;6(1 Suppl):e266. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000266. eCollection 2023 Mar. OTA Int. 2023. PMID: 37006450 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Customised three-dimensional printed revision acetabular implant for large defect after failed triflange revision cup.BMJ Case Rep. 2020 May 25;13(5):e233965. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-233965. BMJ Case Rep. 2020. PMID: 32457031 Free PMC article.
-
Tantalum Augments Combined with Antiprotrusio Cages for Massive Acetabular Defects in Revision Arthroplasty.Arthroplast Today. 2020 Aug 27;6(4):704-709. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.039. eCollection 2020 Dec. Arthroplast Today. 2020. PMID: 32923554 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical