Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES Study
- PMID: 24687826
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8267
Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES Study
Abstract
Purpose: Patient-reported outcomes may help inform treatment choice in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly between approved targeted therapies with similar efficacy. This double-blind cross-over study evaluated patient preference for pazopanib or sunitinib and the influence of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and safety factors on their stated preference.
Patients and methods: Patients with metastatic RCC were randomly assigned to pazopanib 800 mg per day for 10 weeks, a 2-week washout, and then sunitinib 50 mg per day (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 4 weeks on) for 10 weeks, or the reverse sequence. The primary end point, patient preference for a specific treatment, was assessed by questionnaire at the end of the two treatment periods. Other end points and analyses included reasons for preference, physician preference, safety, and HRQoL.
Results: Of 169 randomly assigned patients, 114 met the following prespecified modified intent-to-treat criteria for the primary analysis: exposure to both treatments, no disease progression before cross over, and completion of the preference questionnaire. Significantly more patients preferred pazopanib (70%) over sunitinib (22%); 8% expressed no preference (P < .001). All preplanned sensitivity analyses, including the intent-to-treat population, statistically favored pazopanib. Less fatigue and better overall quality of life were the main reasons for preferring pazopanib, with less diarrhea being the most cited reason for preferring sunitinib. Physicians also preferred pazopanib (61%) over sunitinib (22%); 17% expressed no preference. Adverse events were consistent with each drug's known profile. Pazopanib was superior to sunitinib in HRQoL measures evaluating fatigue, hand/foot soreness, and mouth/throat soreness.
Conclusion: This innovative cross-over trial demonstrated a significant patient preference for pazopanib over sunitinib, with HRQoL and safety as key influencing factors.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01064310.
Comment in
-
How to interpret patient preferences in selecting the best drug: are the current measurements up to the job?J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1392-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1911. Epub 2014 Mar 31. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24687838 No abstract available.
-
Kidney cancer: in crossover study, patients and physicians prefer pazopanib.Nat Rev Urol. 2014 May;11(5):246. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.87. Epub 2014 Apr 15. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 24731995 No abstract available.
-
PISCES trial: the end does not always justify the means.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3782-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8832. Epub 2014 Sep 29. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25267749 No abstract available.
-
Reply to S. Barni et Al and M. Sun et Al.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3783-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9219. Epub 2014 Sep 29. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25267750 No abstract available.
-
Reply to S. Barni et Al and M. Sun et Al.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3785. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9227. Epub 2014 Sep 29. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25267752 No abstract available.
-
PISCES: a horoscope for first-line targeted therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3783. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.4673. Epub 2014 Sep 29. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25267763 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous