Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;11(1):27-31.

Effect of image compression of direct digital lateral cephalograms on the identification of cephalometric points

Sima Saghaie  1 , Roshanak Ghaffari  1
Affiliations

Effect of image compression of direct digital lateral cephalograms on the identification of cephalometric points

Sima Saghaie et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Background: With increase of digital imaging, the need for storage space and transmission speed also increases. Compressed images need less storage space and decrease the transmission time. However, compression could compromise image quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of image compression on the identification of cephalometric points on direct digital lateral cephalogram images, compared with the digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) format.

Materials and methods: In this analytical-descriptive study, 19 direct digital lateral cephalograms saved in DICOM format were used. They were converted to joint photographic experts group (JPEG) 2000 format with quality factors 85, 75, and 60 adding up to 76 images (DICOM, JPEG 85, 75, and 60). The images were randomized and eight cephalometric points were identified on each image by a professional, using the x-y coordinate system. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to investigate if there was a statistically significant difference in the location of cephalometric points between each group of images. All tests were applied at a significance level of 5%.

Results: The results did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in the identification of the eight cephalometric points between the DICOM images and the JPEG2000 quality factors 85, 75, and 60.

Conclusion: JPEG2000 images of lateral cephalograms with quality factors 85, 75, and 60 did not demonstrate any alterations in the identification of cephalometric points compared with the DICOM format. JPEG2000 is a reliable file format for the compression of digital lateral cephalograms.

Keywords: Cephalometry; data compression; dental; digital; radiographs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of images of a patient in (a) DICOM, (b) JPEG2000 85, (c) JPEG2000 75, (d) JPEG2000 60 formats
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brennan J. An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry. J Orthod. 2002;29:66–9. - PubMed
    1. Baxes GA. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994. Digital image processing; pp. 91–5.
    1. Lodwick GS, Taaffe JL. Radiology systems of the nineties: Meeting the challenge of change. J Digit Imaging. 1988;1:4–12. - PubMed
    1. Kang KS, Park HW. Lossless medical image compression by multilevel decomposition. J Digit Imaging. 1996;9:11–20. - PubMed
    1. Visser H, Rodig T, Hermann KP. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:159–63. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources