Nonlinear logistic regression model for outcomes after endourologic procedures: a novel predictor
- PMID: 24691815
- DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0656-1
Nonlinear logistic regression model for outcomes after endourologic procedures: a novel predictor
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to design a thorough and practical nonlinear logistic regression model that can be used for outcome prediction after various forms of endourologic intervention. Input variables and outcome data from 382 renal units endourologically treated at a single institution were used to build and cross-validate an independently designed nonlinear logistic regression model. Model outcomes were stone-free status and need for a secondary procedure. The model predicted stone-free status with sensitivity 75.3% and specificity 60.4%, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 60.4%, with classification accuracy of 69.6%. Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) was 0.749. The model predicted the need for a secondary procedure with sensitivity 30% and specificity 98.3%, yielding a PPV of 60% and NPV of 94.2%. ROC AUC was 0.863. The model had equivalent predictive value to a traditional logistic regression model for the secondary procedure outcome. This study is proof-of-concept that a nonlinear regression model adequately predicts key clinical outcomes after shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This model holds promise for further optimization via dataset expansion, preferably with multi-institutional data, and could be developed into a predictive nomogram in the future.
Similar articles
-
Artificial Neural Network System to Predict the Postoperative Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):461-467. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0791. Epub 2017 Mar 13. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 28287830
-
A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.J Urol. 2013 Jul;190(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.047. Epub 2013 Jan 23. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23353048
-
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25812469
-
Can we improve the prediction of stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? A neural network or a statistical model?J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):175-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000128646.20349.27. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15201765
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update.Curr Opin Urol. 2003 May;13(3):235-41. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200305000-00012. Curr Opin Urol. 2003. PMID: 12692448 Review.
Cited by
-
Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Type and Outcome of Ureteral Stones Treatments.Adv Biomed Res. 2023 Oct 28;12:234. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_121_23. eCollection 2023. Adv Biomed Res. 2023. PMID: 38073755 Free PMC article.
-
Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2329-2347. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03000-5. Epub 2019 Nov 5. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31691082 Review.
-
Applications of artificial intelligence in urological setting: a hopeful path to improved care.J Exerc Rehabil. 2021 Oct 26;17(5):308-312. doi: 10.12965/jer.2142596.298. eCollection 2021 Oct. J Exerc Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34805018 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial intelligence (AI) in urology-Current use and future directions: An iTRUE study.Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S27-S39. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20117. Epub 2020 May 27. Turk J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32479253 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness.World J Urol. 2024 Oct 17;42(1):579. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05268-8. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39417840
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources