Addiction: Current Criticism of the Brain Disease Paradigm
- PMID: 24693488
- PMCID: PMC3969751
- DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2013.796328
Addiction: Current Criticism of the Brain Disease Paradigm
Abstract
To deepen understanding of efforts to consider addiction a "brain disease," we review critical appraisals of the disease model in conjunction with responses from in-depth semistructured stakeholder interviews with (1) patients in treatment for addiction and (2) addiction scientists. Sixty-three patients (from five alcohol and/or nicotine treatment centers in the Midwest) and 20 addiction scientists (representing genetic, molecular, behavioral, and epidemiologic research) were asked to describe their understanding of addiction, including whether they considered addiction to be a disease. To examine the NIDA brain disease paradigm, our approach includes a review of current criticism from the literature, enhanced by the voices of key stakeholders. Many argue that framing addiction as a disease will enhance therapeutic outcomes and allay moral stigma. We conclude that it is not necessary, and may be harmful, to frame addiction as a disease.
Keywords: addiction; language.
References
-
- Acker CJ. Creating the American junkie: Addiction research in the classic era of narcotic control. Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore, MD: 2005.
-
- Acker CJ. How crack found a niche in the American ghetto. Biosocieties. 2010;5(1):70–88.
-
- Andrews HL. Brain potentials and morphine addiction. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1941;3:399–409.
-
- Bush G. Presidential proclamation 6158. O. o. t. F. Register; 1990.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources