Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research
- PMID: 24693543
- PMCID: PMC3932901
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322565111
Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research
Erratum in
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):E1159
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment on
-
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 10;110(37):15031-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302997110. Epub 2013 Aug 26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013. PMID: 23980165 Free PMC article.
-
Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 18;111(7):E712-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322149111. Epub 2014 Feb 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24497511 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
values calculated without the US ij SE … 