Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:872435.
doi: 10.1155/2014/872435. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

A proxy outcome approach for causal effect in observational studies: a simulation study

Wenbin Liang  1 , Yuejen Zhao  2 , Andy H Lee  3
Affiliations

A proxy outcome approach for causal effect in observational studies: a simulation study

Wenbin Liang et al. Biomed Res Int. 2014.

Abstract

Background: Known and unknown/unmeasured risk factors are the main sources of confounding effects in observational studies and can lead to false observations of elevated protective or hazardous effects. In this study, we investigate an alternative approach of analysis that is operated on field-specific knowledge rather than pure statistical assumptions.

Method: The proposed approach introduces a proxy outcome into the estimation system. A proxy outcome possesses the following characteristics: (i) the exposure of interest is not a cause for the proxy outcome; (ii) causes of the proxy outcome and the study outcome are subsets of a collection of correlated variables. Based on these two conditions, the confounding-effect-driven association between the exposure and proxy outcome can then be measured and used as a proxy estimate for the effects of unknown/unmeasured confounders on the outcome of interest. Performance of this approach is tested by a simulation study, whereby 500 different scenarios are generated, with the causal factors of a proxy outcome and a study outcome being partly overlapped under low-to-moderate correlations.

Results: The simulation results demonstrate that the conventional approach only led to a correct conclusion in 21% of the 500 scenarios, as compared to 72.2% for the alternative approach.

Conclusion: The proposed method can be applied in observational studies in social science and health research that evaluates the health impact of behaviour and mental health problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lin DY, Psaty BM, Kronmal RA. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics. 1998;54(3):948–963. - PubMed
    1. Greenland S. The impact of prior distributions for uncontrolled confounding and response bias: a case study of the relation of wire codes and magnetic fields to childhood leukemia. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2003;98(461):47–54.
    1. Greenland S, Copas J, Jones DR, et al. Multiple-bias modelling for analysis of observational data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A. 2005;168(2):267–306.
    1. McCandless LC, Gustafson P, Levy A. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine. 2007;26(11):2331–2347. - PubMed
    1. Arah OA, Chiba Y, Greenland S. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders. Annals of Epidemiology. 2008;18(8):637–646. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources