Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;53(9):1143-50.
doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.899434. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

No clinically relevant effect on cognitive outcomes after low-dose radiation to the infant brain: a population-based cohort study in Sweden

Affiliations
Free PMC article

No clinically relevant effect on cognitive outcomes after low-dose radiation to the infant brain: a population-based cohort study in Sweden

Malin Blomstrand et al. Acta Oncol. 2014 Sep.
Free PMC article

Abstract

While the detrimental effects of cranial radiotherapy on the developing brain are well known, the effects on cognitive performance of low doses of ionizing radiation is less studied. We performed a population-based cohort study to determine whether low doses of ionizing radiation to the brain in infancy affects cognitive function later in life. Further we hypothesized that the dose to the hippocampus predicts cognitive late side effects better than the anterior or the posterior brain doses.

Material and methods: During 1950-1960 3860 boys were treated with radiation in Sweden for cutaneous hemangiomas before the age of 18 months. Of these, 3030 were analyzed for military test scores at the age of 18 years and 2559 for the highest obtained educational level.

Results: Logical, spatial and technical test scores were not affected by increasing irradiation doses. The verbal test scores displayed a significant trend for decreasing scores with increasing doses to the hippocampus (p = 0.005). However, the absolute mean difference between the zero dose and the highest dose category (median 680 mGy) was very small, only 0.64 stanine points, and the significance was dependent on the highest dose category, containing few subjects. The educational level was not affected by brain irradiation. Overall, the hippocampal dose was a better predictor of late cognitive side effects than the doses to the anterior or the posterior brain. In conclusion, there was no decrease in logical, spatial and technical verbal or global test scores after ionizing radiation doses up to 250 mGy, but a subtle decrease in verbal test scores if the highest dose category was included (median 680 mGy). However, the clinical relevance of this decline in the highest dose group is questionable, since we could not find any effect on the highest obtained educational level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria in the study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
For each patient the estimated absorbed dose to the anterior brain, the posterior brain and the hippocampus was calculated. The number of subjects in each dose category (mGy) is shown, separated into the anterior brain (green), posterior brain (blue) and the hippocampus (red).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Results from the Swedish Military Service Conscription Register Data from the cognitive test for the 3030 subjects, separated into the five dose categories. The results are plotted based on the dose to the anterior brain (green), the posterior brain (blue) and the hippocampus (red). The tests results were adjusted for age at treatment and year of birth. The error bars indicate standard error. (A) Results from the logical test. P for trend: anterior 0.12, posterior 0.79 and hippocampus 0.09. (B) Results from the verbal test. P for trend: anterior 0.02, posterior 0.97 and hippocampus 0.005. (C) Results from the spatial test. P for trend: anterior 0.70, posterior 0.58 and hippocampus 0.35. (D) Results from the technical test. P for trend: anterior 0.45, posterior 0.81 and hippocampus 0.18. (E) Combined results from the four tests, yielding a global score. P for trend: anterior 0.23, posterior 0.91 and hippocampus 0.06.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mulhern RK, Merchant TE, Gajjar A, Reddick WE, Kun LE. Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5:399–408. - PubMed
    1. Pollack IF, Jakacki RI. Childhood brain tumors: Epidemiology, current management and future directions. Nature Rev Neurol. 2011;7:495–506. - PubMed
    1. Packer RJ, Gurney JG, Punyko JA, Donaldson SS, Inskip PD, Stovall M, et al. Long-term neurologic and neurosensory sequelae in adult survivors of a childhood brain tumor: Childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3255–61. - PubMed
    1. Lannering B, Marky I, Lundberg A, Olsson E. Long-term sequelae after pediatric brain tumors: Their effect on disability and quality of life. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1990;18:304–10. - PubMed
    1. Neglia JP, Robison LL, Stovall M, Liu Y, Packer RJ, Hammond S, et al. New primary neoplasms of the central nervous system in survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1528–37. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources