Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;24(3):535-45.
doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.889921.

Sample size consideration for immunoassay screening cut-point determination

Affiliations

Sample size consideration for immunoassay screening cut-point determination

Jianchun Zhang et al. J Biopharm Stat. 2014.

Abstract

Past decades have seen a rapid growth of biopharmaceutical products on the market. The administration of such large molecules can generate antidrug antibodies that can induce unwanted immune reactions in the recipients. Assessment of immunogenicity is required by regulatory agencies in clinical and nonclinical development, and this demands a well-validated assay. One of the important performance characteristics during assay validation is the cut point, which serves as a threshold between positive and negative samples. To precisely determine the cut point, a sufficiently large data set is often needed. However, there is no guideline other than some rule-of-thumb recommendations for sample size requirement in immunoassays. In this article, we propose a systematic approach to sample size determination for immunoassays and provide tables that facilitate its applications by scientists.

Keywords: ANOVA; Antidrug antibody; Cut point; Immunogenicity; Sample size; Variance component model.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources