Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;58(1):43-7.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.126794.

A comparative study between intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine with intrathecal bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries

Affiliations

A comparative study between intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine with intrathecal bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries

N Yoganarasimha et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Background and aims: Spinal anaesthesia requires a small volume of drug to produce profound reproducible sensory analgesia and motor blockade, but has limited duration of action. A properly chosen adjuvant to local anaesthetic agent produces the best way to achieve a better quality regional block. Hence, a study was conducted to compare the effect of intrathecal clonidine 75 μg or neostigmine 50 μg added to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, with regards to sensory characteristics, motor characteristics, haemodynamic stability and side effects.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized experimental study in 50 patients posted for lower abdominal surgery belonging to ASA I and II status and aged between18 and 60 years. One group received intrathecal clonidine 75 μg and 2.5 ml (12.5 mg) of intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (group BC) and second group received neostigmine 50 μg with 2.5 ml (12.5mg) of intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (group BN) and they were compared with regards to sensory characteristics, motor characteristics, haemodynamic stability and side effects.

Results: Addition of 50 μg neostigmine significantly enhanced the onset of sensory block (BN - 90 ± 15 secs, BC-160 ± 20 secs, P value as <0.05) and motor block (BN-110 ± 15 secs, BC-210 ± 20 secs, P value as <0.05) compared to clonidine. Haemodynamics were well maintained in the neostigmine group. Group BC had prolonged analgesia (362 ± 36 mins) compared to BN group (300 ± 25 mins)(P < 0.05) with no serious adverse effects noted perioperatively in either groups.

Conclusion: Intrathecal clonidine with hyperbaric bupivacaine produces prolonged postoperative analgesia and intrathecal neostigmine with bupivacaine produces a good sensory and motor for the surgical procedure.

Keywords: Analgesia; bromage scale; clonidine; hyperbaric; lower abdominal surgery; neostigmine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Heart rate comparison
Figure 2
Figure 2
Systolic blood pressure comparison

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eisenach JC, De Kock M, Klimscha W. Alpha (2)-adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia: A clinical review of Clonidine. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:655–74. - PubMed
    1. Strebel S, Gurzeler JA, Schneider MC, Aeschbach A, Kindler CH. Small- dose Intrathecal Clonidine and Isobaric Bupivacaine for Orthopaedic surgery: A dose response study. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1231–8. - PubMed
    1. Bouaziz H, Tong C, Eisenach JC. Post operative analgesia from intrathecal Neostigmine in sheep. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:1140–4. - PubMed
    1. Bromage PR. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1978. Epidural analgesia; p. 144.
    1. Siddall PJ, Molloy AR, Walker S, Mather LE, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. The efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine and Clonidine in the treatment of pain after spinal cord injury. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:1493–8. - PubMed