Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;8(2):114-7.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7883.4023. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine with buprenorphine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in spinal asnaesthesia

Affiliations

Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine with buprenorphine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in spinal asnaesthesia

Mahima Gupta et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The supplementation of local anaesthetics with adjuvants to improve the efficacy of subarachnoid block has been recognised since long. The most preferred drug has been opioids, but newer drugs like dexmedetomidine has also been introduced and investigated as an effective adjuvant.

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the characteristics of subarachnoid blockade, hemodynamic stability and adverse effects of intrathecal buprenorphine and intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries.

Materials and methods: The present study included 60 patients aged between 18-60 years classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) I/II scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgeries. The patients were randomly allotted to two groups to receive intrathecal 3ml of 0.5% bupivacine with 60µg of buprenorphine (Group B; n=30) or 3ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 5µg of dexmedetomidine (Group D; n=30). The onset time to peak sensory level, motor block, sedation, Haemodynamic variables, duration of motor block, analgesia and any adverse effects were noted.

Results: There was no significant difference between groups regarding demographic characteristics and type of surgery. The motor, sensory blockade and time of rescue analgesia were significantly prolonged in Group D compared to Group B. The sedation level was higher in Group D compared to Group B. There was no significant difference in haemodynamic variables although Group B had lower Heart Rate (HR) than Group D.

Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine when compared to intrathecal buprenorphine causes prolonged anaesthesia and analgesia with reduced need for sedation and rescue analgesics.

Keywords: Buprenorphine; Lower abdominal surgery; α–2 adrenergic agonist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-4]:
[Table/Fig-4]:
Mean systolic blood pressure
[Table/Fig-5]:
[Table/Fig-5]:
Mean diastolic blood pressure
[Table/Fig-6]:
[Table/Fig-6]:
Mean heart rate

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shaikh SI, Kiran M. Intrathecal buprenorphine for post-operative analgesia: A prospective randomised double blind study. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2010;26:35–8.
    1. Gupta R, Verma R, Bogra J, Kohli M, Raman R, Kushwaha JK. A comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine. >J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011;27:339–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tarbeeh GA, Mohamed AA. Effects of intrathecal bupivacaine–fentanyl versus bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine in diabetic surgical patients. Egyptian J Anaesth. 2013;29:13–8.
    1. Mohamed AA, Fares KM, Mohamed SA. Efficacy of intrathecally administered dexmedetomidine verses dexmedetomidine with fentanyl in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. Pain Physician. 2012;15:339–48. - PubMed
    1. Wang JK, Nauss LA, Thomas JE. Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man. Anesthesiology. 1979;50:149–51. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources