Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;2(4):279-288.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70199-2. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

Fructosamine and glycated albumin for risk stratification and prediction of incident diabetes and microvascular complications: a prospective cohort analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Affiliations

Fructosamine and glycated albumin for risk stratification and prediction of incident diabetes and microvascular complications: a prospective cohort analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Elizabeth Selvin et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Background: HbA1c is the standard measure by which to monitor long-term (2-3 months) glucose control in people with diabetes and is now used for diagnosis of diabetes. Fructosamine and glycated albumin are markers of short-term (2-4 weeks) glycaemic control that might add complementary prognostic information to HbA1c. Our aim was to clarify the performance of fructosamine and glycated albumin measurements for identifying people at risk of incident diabetes or diabetic complications.

Methods: We measured glycated albumin and fructosamine in blood samples from 11 348 adults without diabetes and 958 adults diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (both type 1 and 2) who attended the second examination of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study in 1990-92 (baseline). We assessed the associations of fructosamine and glycated albumin with risk of incident diabetes, retinopathy, and risk of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD), during two decades of follow-up. We compared these associations with those of HbA1c with incident diabetes, retinopathy, and CKD. For analyses of associations with incident diabetes and CKD, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Model discrimination was assessed using Harrell's C statistic.

Findings: The HRs for incident diabetes were 4·96 (4·36-5·64) for fructosamine above the 95th percentile and 6·17 (5·45-6·99) for glycated albumin above the 95th percentile. Associations were attenuated but persisted after adjustment for HbA1c. Fructosamine and glycated albumin were strongly associated with retinopathy (p<0·0001 for trend). The multivariable-adjusted HRs for CKD for people with fructosamine and glycated albumin above the 95th percentile were 1·50 (95% CI 1·22-1·85) and 1·48 (1·20-1·83), respectively, when compared with people with no diabetes and fructosamine or glycated albumin below the 75th percentile. Prediction of incident CKD by fructosamine (C statistic 0·717) and glycated albumin (0·717) were nearly as strong as by HbA1c (0·726), but HbA1c outperformed fructosamine and glycated albumin for prediction of incident diabetes with C statistics of 0·760, 0·706, and 0·703, respectively.

Interpretation: Fructosamine and glycated albumin were strongly associated with incident diabetes and its microvascular complications, with prognostic value comparable to HbA1c.

Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (95% Confidence Intervals) for baseline Fructosamine, Glycated Albumin, and Hemoglobin A1c with incident Chronic Kidney Disease and Incident Diabetes
Legend: Adjusted hazard ratios are from Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for age (years), race-center, sex (male, female), body mass index (kg/m2), (body mass index)2. Baseline fructosamine, glycated albumin, and hemoglobin A1c were modeled using restricted cubic splines (solid lines) with knots at the 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles. All models are centered at the 50th percentile (fructosamine: 228 umol/L, glycated albumin: 12.7%, hemoglobin A1c: 5.4%). The shaded areas are the confidence intervals for the restricted cubic spline models. Models are truncated at the 5th and 95th percentile of each marker, histograms are truncated at the 1st and 99th percentile. For incident chronic kidney disease, baseline study population was limited to persons with normal kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2), N=11,932. For incident diabetes, baseline study population was limited to persons without a history of diabetes, N=10,946.

Comment in

  • Are glycated serum proteins ready for prime time?
    Cohen RM, Herman WH. Cohen RM, et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Apr;2(4):264-265. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70003-8. Epub 2014 Jan 15. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014. PMID: 24703035 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Diabetes A. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S11–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colagiuri S, Lee CM, Wong TY, Balkau B, Shaw JE, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. Glycemic thresholds for diabetes-specific retinopathy: implications for diagnostic criteria for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):145–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng YJ, Gregg EW, Geiss LS, Imperatore G, Williams DE, Zhang X, et al. Association of A1C and fasting plasma glucose levels with diabetic retinopathy prevalence in the U.S. population: Implications for diabetes diagnostic thresholds. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2027–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, Liew G, Tapp RJ, Schmidt MI, Wang JJ, Mitchell P, et al. Relation between fasting glucose and retinopathy for diagnosis of diabetes: three population-based cross-sectional studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9614):736–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davidson MB, Schriger DL, Peters AL, Lorber B. Relationship Between Fasting Plasma Glucose and Glycosylated Hemoglobin: Potential for False-Positive Diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Using New Diagnostic Criteria. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;281(13):1203–10. - PubMed

Publication types