Predictive accuracy of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale assessment during pregnancy for the risk of developing postpartum depressive symptoms: a prospective cohort study
- PMID: 24703235
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12759
Predictive accuracy of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale assessment during pregnancy for the risk of developing postpartum depressive symptoms: a prospective cohort study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) administered antenatally is accurate in predicting postpartum depressive symptoms, and whether a two-item EPDS has similar predictive accuracy.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Obstetric care in the Netherlands.
Population: One thousand six hundred and twenty women from the general population.
Methods: Mean values, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of antenatal EPDS for the likelihood of developing postpartum depressive symptoms were calculated. Analyses were repeated for each trimester, several cut-off values and a two-item EPDS (low mood and anhedonia).
Main outcome measures: Postpartum depressive symptoms, defined as EPDS score≥10.
Results: Mean EPDS scores were significantly higher during each trimester in women with postpartum depressive symptoms than in those without the symptoms (P<0.001). Using the prevailing cut-off (≥13), the AUC was reasonable (0.74), sensitivity was 16.8% (95% CI 11.0-24.1), positive predictive value was 41.8% (95% CI 28.7-55.9), specificity was 97.8% (95% CI 97.0-98.5) and negative predictive value was 92.7% (95% CI 91.3-94.0). Using a lower cut-off value (≥5), sensitivity was 70.8% (95% CI 62.4-78.3) and specificity was 65.4% 4 (95% CI 62.9-67.8), but positive predictive value was low (15.9%, 95% CI 13.1-19.0). Negative predictive value was exceedingly high at 96.0% (95% CI 94.6-97.2). Results were similar during the second and third trimester. The predictive accuracy of the two-item EPDS appeared inferior.
Conclusions: The EPDS was not sufficiently accurate in predicting risk of postpartum depressive symptoms. Nevertheless, when using the ≥5 cut-off value, it may be adequate for initial screening, followed by further assessments and possibly antenatal intervention when positive. Furthermore, when negative, women may be reassured that postpartum depressive symptoms are unlikely. A two-item version showed poor predictive accuracy.
Keywords: Antenatal depression; postpartum depression; predictive accuracy.
© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Similar articles
-
Antenatal screening timeline and cutoff scores of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for predicting postpartum depressive symptoms in healthy women: a prospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 28;22(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04740-w. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35764977 Free PMC article.
-
Improving discrimination in antepartum depression screening using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.J Affect Disord. 2017 May;214:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Feb 24. J Affect Disord. 2017. PMID: 28260619
-
Optimal cut-off score of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for major depressive episode during pregnancy in Japan.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;71(12):836-842. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12562. Epub 2017 Sep 10. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28767198
-
Anxious and depressive components of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in maternal postpartum psychological problems.J Perinat Med. 2013 Jul;41(4):343-8. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0258. J Perinat Med. 2013. PMID: 23426862 Review.
-
Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.BMJ. 2020 Nov 11;371:m4022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4022. BMJ. 2020. PMID: 33177069 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Depression Level and Its Associated Factors among Postpartum Working Women in Kuching, Sarawak-A Cross-Sectional Study.Malays J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;30(4):147-156. doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.4.13. Epub 2023 Aug 24. Malays J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37655155 Free PMC article.
-
Peripartum depression: Does risk versus diagnostic status impact mother-infant bonding and perceived social support?Depress Anxiety. 2021 Apr;38(4):390-399. doi: 10.1002/da.23121. Epub 2020 Dec 7. Depress Anxiety. 2021. PMID: 33615587 Free PMC article.
-
Review of the prevalence of postnatal depression across cultures.AIMS Public Health. 2018 Jul 20;5(3):260-295. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.260. eCollection 2018. AIMS Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30280116 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acetaminophen use in pregnancy: Examining prevalence, timing, and indication of use in a prospective birth cohort.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 May;34(3):237-246. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12595. Epub 2019 Nov 7. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 31696962 Free PMC article.
-
Cortisol response to the Trier Social Stress Test in pregnant women at risk for postpartum depression.Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016 Oct;19(5):789-97. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0615-7. Epub 2016 Mar 7. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016. PMID: 26951216 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical