Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(4):259-276.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

Impact of cooking and home food preparation interventions among adults: outcomes and implications for future programs

Marla Reicks  1 , Amanda C Trofholz  2 , Jamie S Stang  2 , Melissa N Laska  2
Affiliations
Review

Impact of cooking and home food preparation interventions among adults: outcomes and implications for future programs

Marla Reicks et al. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Cooking programs are growing in popularity; however, an extensive review has not examined their overall impact. Therefore, this study reviewed previous research on cooking/home food preparation interventions and diet and health-related outcomes among adults and identified implications for practice and research.

Design: Literature review and descriptive summative method.

Main outcome measures: Dietary intake, knowledge/skills, cooking attitudes and self-efficacy/confidence, health outcomes.

Analysis: Articles evaluating the effectiveness of interventions that included cooking/home food preparation as the primary aim (January, 1980 through December, 2011) were identified via Ovid MEDLINE, Agricola, and Web of Science databases. Studies grouped according to design and outcomes were reviewed for validity using an established coding system. Results were summarized for several outcome categories.

Results: Of 28 studies identified, 12 included a control group with 6 as nonrandomized and 6 as randomized controlled trials. Evaluation was done postintervention for 5 studies, pre- and postintervention for 23, and beyond postintervention for 15. Qualitative and quantitative measures suggested a positive influence on main outcomes. However, nonrigorous study designs, varying study populations, and the use of nonvalidated assessment tools limited stronger conclusions.

Conclusions and implications: Well-designed studies are needed that rigorously evaluate long-term impact on cooking behavior, dietary intake, obesity and other health outcomes.

Keywords: cooking; diet outcomes; food preparation; intervention; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Jabs J, Devine CM. Time scarcity and food choices: an overview. Appetite. 2006;47:196–204. - PubMed
    1. Soliah LL, Walter JM, Jones SA. Benefits and barriers to healthful eating: what are the consequences of decreased food preparation ability? Am J Lifestyle Med. 2012;6:152–158.
    1. Clausen A. Food CPI and Expenditures Briefing Room, Table 10. [Accessed 4-4-12];US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2011 http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cpifoodandexpenditures/Data/Expenditure....
    1. Bowman SA, Vinyard BT. Fast food consumption of US adults: impact on energy and nutrient intakes and overweight status. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23:163–168. - PubMed
    1. Ma Y, Bertone ER, Stanek EJ, 3rd, et al. Associations between eating patterns and obesity in a free-living US adult population. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:85–92. - PubMed

Publication types