Next generation diagnostic molecular pathology: critical appraisal of quality assurance in Europe
- PMID: 24704265
- PMCID: PMC5528536
- DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.03.004
Next generation diagnostic molecular pathology: critical appraisal of quality assurance in Europe
Abstract
Tumor evaluation in pathology is more and more based on a combination of traditional histopathology and molecular analysis. Due to the rapid development of new cancer treatments that specifically target aberrant proteins present in tumor cells, treatment decisions are increasingly based on the molecular features of the tumor. Not only the number of patients eligible for targeted precision medicine, but also the number of molecular targets per patient and tumor type is rising. Diagnostic molecular pathology, the discipline that determines the molecular aberrations present in tumors for diagnostic, prognostic or predictive purposes, is faced with true challenges. The laboratories have to meet the need of comprehensive molecular testing using only limited amount of tumor tissue, mostly fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE), in short turnaround time. Choices must be made for analytical methods that provide accurate, reliable and cost-effective results. Validation of the test procedures and results is essential. In addition, participation and good performance in internal (IQA) and external quality assurance (EQA) schemes is mandatory. In this review, we critically evaluate the validation procedure for comprehensive molecular tests as well as the organization of quality assurance and assessment of competence of diagnostic molecular pathology laboratories within Europe.
Keywords: Molecular pathology; Next generation sequencing; Proficiency testing; Quality assessment; Quality assurance; Tumor testing.
Copyright © 2014 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers.Virchows Arch. 2016 Jan;468(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1839-z. Epub 2015 Aug 26. Virchows Arch. 2016. PMID: 26306715 Review.
-
External quality assessment (EQA) and alternative assessment procedures (AAPs) in molecular diagnostics: findings of an international survey.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 May 8;59(2):301-306. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0101. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020. PMID: 32383687
-
Current landscape and new paradigms of proficiency testing and external quality assessment for molecular genetics.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Jul;137(7):983-8. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0311-RA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013. PMID: 23808472 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive molecular pathology of lung cancer in Germany with focus on gene fusion testing: Methods and quality assurance.Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Sep;128(9):611-621. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22293. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020. PMID: 32885916 Review.
-
[Significance of participation in programs of external quality assessment in molecular diagnostic--our experience].Acta Med Croatica. 2011 Sep;65 Suppl 1:105-14. Acta Med Croatica. 2011. PMID: 23126037 Croatian.
Cited by
-
Primary melanocytic tumors of the central nervous system: a review with focus on molecular aspects.Brain Pathol. 2015 Mar;25(2):209-26. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12241. Brain Pathol. 2015. PMID: 25534128 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment Algorithms Based on Tumor Molecular Profiling: The Essence of Precision Medicine Trials.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 23;108(4):djv362. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv362. Print 2016 Apr. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 26598514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Performance of amplicon-based next generation DNA sequencing for diagnostic gene mutation profiling in oncopathology.Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2014 Oct;37(5):353-61. doi: 10.1007/s13402-014-0196-2. Epub 2014 Sep 11. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2014. PMID: 25209392
-
Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers.Virchows Arch. 2016 Jan;468(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1839-z. Epub 2015 Aug 26. Virchows Arch. 2016. PMID: 26306715 Review.
-
Clinical applicability and cost of a 46-gene panel for genomic analysis of solid tumours: Retrospective validation and prospective audit in the UK National Health Service.PLoS Med. 2017 Feb 14;14(2):e1002230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002230. eCollection 2017 Feb. PLoS Med. 2017. PMID: 28196074 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blokx, W.A. , Lesterhuis, W.J. , Andriessen, M.P. , 2007. CDKN2A (INK4A-ARF) mutation analysis to distinguish cutaneous melanoma metastasis from a second primary melanoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.. 31, 637–641. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources