Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 5;5(1):108-46.
doi: 10.3390/genes5010108.

Mechanisms of base substitution mutagenesis in cancer genomes

Affiliations

Mechanisms of base substitution mutagenesis in cancer genomes

Albino Bacolla et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

Cancer genome sequence data provide an invaluable resource for inferring the key mechanisms by which mutations arise in cancer cells, favoring their survival, proliferation and invasiveness. Here we examine recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for the predominant type of genetic alteration found in cancer cells, somatic single base substitutions (SBSs). Cytosine methylation, demethylation and deamination, charge transfer reactions in DNA, DNA replication timing, chromatin status and altered DNA proofreading activities are all now known to contribute to the mechanisms leading to base substitution mutagenesis. We review current hypotheses as to the major processes that give rise to SBSs and evaluate their relative relevance in the light of knowledge acquired from cancer genome sequencing projects and the study of base modifications, DNA repair and lesion bypass. Although gene expression data on APOBEC3B enzymes provide support for a role in cancer mutagenesis through U:G mismatch intermediates, the enzyme preference for single-stranded DNA may limit its activity genome-wide. For SBSs at both CG:CG and YC:GR sites, we outline evidence for a prominent role of damage by charge transfer reactions that follow interactions of the DNA with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other endogenous or exogenous electron-abstracting molecules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(Top) Cytosine methylation and demethylation pathways; (Bottom) Products of cytosine and C5-substituted cytosine deamination.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) by isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDH) enzymes and conversion of α-KG to d-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) by gain-of-function mutations in IDH1 or IDH2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Numbering scheme for cytosines; (b) Pathways for the spontaneous deamination of C and 5mC (only 5mC is shown).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sequence context-dependent reaction products of 8-oxoG.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) cis-trans stereoisomer pair of 5R thymine glycol; (b) cis-trans stereoisomer pair of 5S thymine glycol.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Canonical G:C base-pair; (b) Canonical A:T base-pair; (c) 8-oxoG(syn):A(anti) base-pair; (d) Gh:G base-pair; (e) Sp:G base-pair; (f) Iz:G base-pair; (g) Oz:G base-pair. For noncanonical base-pairs, the templating base is shown in blue.

References

    1. Garraway L.A., Lander E.S. Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell. 2013;153:17–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vogelstein B., Papadopoulos N., Velculescu V.E., Zhou S., Diaz L.A., Jr., Kinzler K.W. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 2013;339:1546–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.1235122. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nik-Zainal S., Alexandrov L.B., Wedge D.C., van Loo P., Greenman C.D., Raine K., Jones D., Hinton J., Marshall J., Stebbings L.A., et al. Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers. Cell. 2012;149:979–993. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forment J.V., Kaidi A., Jackson S.P. Chromothripsis and cancer: Causes and consequences of chromosome shattering. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12:663–670. doi: 10.1038/nrc3352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang L., Luquette L.J., Gehlenborg N., Xi R., Haseley P.S., Hsieh C.H., Zhang C., Ren X., Protopopov A., Chin L., et al. Diverse mechanisms of somatic structural variations in human cancer genomes. Cell. 2013;153:919–929. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources