Results of a randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim versus placebo in patients with low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia
- PMID: 24706489
- PMCID: PMC4298760
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28663
Results of a randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim versus placebo in patients with low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia
Abstract
Background: Thrombocytopenia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is associated with shortened survival and an increased risk of evolution to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of romiplostim in patients who had thrombocytopenia with low-risk/intermediate-1-risk MDS.
Methods: Patients who had thrombocytopenia with low-risk/intermediate-1-risk MDS (N = 250) were randomized 2:1 to receive romiplostim or placebo weekly for 58 weeks.
Results: The primary endpoint- the number of clinically significant bleeding events (CSBEs) per patient-had a hazard ratio for romiplostim:placebo of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.05; P = .13). CSBEs were reduced significantly in the romiplostim group for patients who had baseline platelet counts ≥20 × 10(9) /L (P < .0001). For patients who had baseline platelet counts <20 × 10(9) /L, there was no difference in the number of CSBEs, but the platelet transfusion rates were higher in the placebo group (P < .0001), which may have affected the overall CSBE results in this group with severe thrombocytopenia. The incidence of bleeding events was reduced significantly in the romiplostim group (relative risk, 0.92), as were protocol-defined platelet transfusions (relative risk, 0.77). Platelet response rates according to 2006 International Working Group criteria were higher for the group that received romiplostim (odds ratio, 15.6). On the basis of interim data, an independent data monitoring committee advised halting study drug because of concerns regarding excess blasts and AML rates with romiplostim (interim hazard ratio, 2.51). At 58 weeks, the AML rates were 6% in the romiplostim group and 4.9% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.84), and the overall survival rates were similar.
Conclusions: Romiplostim treatment in patients with low-risk/intermediate-1-risk MDS increased platelet counts and decreased the number of bleeding events and platelet transfusions. Although study drug was discontinued because of an initial concern of AML risk, survival and AML rates were similar with romiplostim and placebo.
Keywords: drug therapy; myelodysplastic syndromes; randomized controlled trial; romiplostim; thrombocytopenia.
© 2014 Amgen, Inc. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Long-term follow-up for up to 5 years on the risk of leukaemic progression in thrombocytopenic patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with romiplostim or placebo in a randomised double-blind trial.Lancet Haematol. 2018 Mar;5(3):e117-e126. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30016-4. Epub 2018 Jan 26. Lancet Haematol. 2018. PMID: 29396092 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of romiplostim in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):437-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7999. Epub 2009 Dec 14. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20008626 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized controlled trial of romiplostim in patients with low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome receiving decitabine.Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Feb;54(2):321-8. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.713477. Epub 2012 Nov 15. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013. PMID: 22906162 Clinical Trial.
-
Romiplostim.Cancer Treat Res. 2011;157:267-88. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7073-2_16. Cancer Treat Res. 2011. PMID: 21052962 Review.
-
Romiplostim in chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura.Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1887-907. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.013. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19843480 Review.
Cited by
-
Hypomethylating agent combination strategies in myelodysplastic syndromes: hopes and shortcomings.Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 May;58(5):1022-1036. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1228927. Epub 2016 Sep 21. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017. PMID: 27654579 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How I Manage Transplant Ineligible Patients with Myelodysplastic Neoplasms.Clin Hematol Int. 2023 Mar;5(1):8-20. doi: 10.1007/s44228-022-00024-4. Epub 2022 Dec 27. Clin Hematol Int. 2023. PMID: 36574201 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current and Future Treatment Options for Myelodysplastic Syndromes: More Than Hypomethylating Agents and Lenalidomide?Drugs. 2018 Dec;78(18):1873-1885. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1011-6. Drugs. 2018. PMID: 30467725 Review.
-
Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for the treatment of inherited thrombocytopenia.Haematologica. 2020 Mar;105(3):536-538. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.241786. Haematologica. 2020. PMID: 32115414 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Resuscitating a dying marrow: the role of hematopoietic growth factors.Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014 Dec;9(4):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11899-014-0236-z. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014. PMID: 25311958 Review.
References
-
- Garcia-Manero G, Shan J, Faderl S, et al. A prognostic score for patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2008;22:538–543. - PubMed
-
- Gonzalez-Porras J, Cordoba I, Such E, et al. Prognostic impact of severe thrombocytopenia in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2011;117:5529–5537. - PubMed
-
- Kantarjian H, Giles F, List A, et al. The incidence and impact of thrombocytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer. 2007;109:1705–1714. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous