Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit
- PMID: 24707912
- DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000078
Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit
Abstract
This research examined whether confirming postidentification feedback following a mistaken identification impairs eyewitness memory for the original culprit. We also examined whether the degree of similarity between a mistakenly identified individual and the actual culprit plays a role in memory impairment. Participant-witnesses (N = 145) made mistaken identifications from a "similar" or a "dissimilar" culprit-absent photo lineup. The similar lineup contained individuals who were similar in appearance to the actual culprit and the dissimilar lineup contained individuals who were dissimilar in appearance to the actual culprit. After their identifications, witnesses were given confirming feedback ("Good job! You identified the suspect.") or no feedback. The experimenter then feigned having accidentally given the witnesses the wrong photo lineup. After telling witnesses to disregard whatever they saw in the first lineup, the experimenter gave witnesses the "correct" (culprit-present) lineup and told the witnesses to do their best to identify the culprit. Identifying a dissimilar individual and receiving confirming feedback after a misidentification had independent impairing effects on memory for the original culprit. Results extend the traditional conceptualization of the postidentification feedback effect by showing that confirming feedback not only distorts witnesses' retrospective self-reports, but it also impairs recognition memory for the culprit.
Similar articles
-
Does anyone else look familiar? Influencing identification decisions by asking witnesses to re-examine the lineup.Law Hum Behav. 2018 Aug;42(4):306-320. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000291. Epub 2018 Jun 25. Law Hum Behav. 2018. PMID: 29939064 Free PMC article.
-
Post-identification feedback to eyewitnesses impairs evaluators' abilities to discriminate between accurate and mistaken testimony.Law Hum Behav. 2014 Apr;38(2):194-202. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000067. Epub 2013 Dec 16. Law Hum Behav. 2014. PMID: 24341835 Clinical Trial.
-
Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Dec;16(4):387-98. doi: 10.1037/a0021034. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010. PMID: 21198255
-
Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):62-74. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000095. Epub 2014 Jun 23. Law Hum Behav. 2015. PMID: 24955851 Review.
-
Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105877. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105877. Epub 2024 Jul 14. Cognition. 2024. PMID: 39002429 Review.
Cited by
-
The Difference between Right and Wrong: Accuracy of Older and Younger Adults' Story Recall.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Sep 2;12(9):10861-85. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120910861. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26404344 Free PMC article.
-
Lineup position affects guessing-based selection but not culprit-presence detection in simultaneous and sequential lineups.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78936-9. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39532964 Free PMC article.
-
Does anyone else look familiar? Influencing identification decisions by asking witnesses to re-examine the lineup.Law Hum Behav. 2018 Aug;42(4):306-320. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000291. Epub 2018 Jun 25. Law Hum Behav. 2018. PMID: 29939064 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources