Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;23(3):172-7.
doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000071.

BRAF and NRAS mutations are heterogeneous and not mutually exclusive in nodular melanoma

Affiliations

BRAF and NRAS mutations are heterogeneous and not mutually exclusive in nodular melanoma

Caterina Chiappetta et al. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Inhibitors of RAF inhibit the MAPK pathway that plays an important role in the development and progression of those melanoma carrying the V600E BRAF mutation, but there's a subset of such patients who do not respond to the therapy. Various mechanisms of drug resistance have been proposed which include the clonal heterogeneity of the tumor. We have studied a population of nodular melanoma to investigate the intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity by Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) analysis. Our results showed that BRAF and NRAS mutations were detected in 47% and 33% of nodular melanoma, respectively, and that there is a discrepancy in mutational pattern of tumoral sample because in the 36% of patients a different mutation, in at least 1 area of the tumor, was found by LCM analysis, giving evidence of the presence of different clonal cells populations. Moreover, we found that mutations in BRAF and NRAS are not mutually exclusive because they were simultaneously present in the same tumor specimens and we observed that when the 2 different mutations were present one is a high-frequency mutation and the other is a low-frequency mutation. This was more evident in lymphonodal metastasis that resulted from wild type to mutational analysis, but showed different mutations following LCM analysis. Therefore, we believed that, when primary tumoral sample results negative to mutational analysis, if it is possible, metastases should be investigated to verify the presence of mutations. Generally, it should be searched for other mutations, in addition to BRAF V600E, so as to better understand the mechanism of drug resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sequencing electropherograms of the regions of BRAF exons 11 and 15 and NRAS exons 1 and 2. In each line, the first electropherogram corresponds to the tumoral sample, the other 3 electropherograms correspond to the 3 areas of the microdissected tumor. A, Patient that shows the same 2 mutations of tumor sample (S467L of BRAF exon 11, Q61R of NRAS exon 2) in all 3 areas; (B) patient that shows the same mutation found in tumoral sample in all 3 areas (Q61R of NRAS exon 2) and also other 2 mutation in 2 different areas (A598V and V600R on BRAF exon 15, respectively); (C) patient that shows the V600E mutation of BRAF exon 15 in all 3 areas while the tumoral sample is referred to as wild type (WT).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Sequencing electropherograms of the LCM areas that show mutations in BRAF exons 11 and 15 and NRAS exons 1 and 2 of metastatic samples. In each line, the first electropherogram corresponds to the metastatic sample, the other 3 electropherograms correspond to the 3 areas of the microdissected metastasis. A, Metastatic sample that shows the V590I mutation of BRAF exon 15 in 1 area; (B) metastatic sample that shows the V600E mutation of BRAF exon 15 in 2 areas and the S614P mutation of BRAF exon 15 also in area 2; (C) metastatic sample that shows the V600E mutation of BRAF exon 15 only in 1 area; (D) metastatic sample that shows 2 different mutation in 2 different areas, G469R of BRAF exon 11 and G13R of NRAS exon 1.

Comment in

References

    1. Nestle FO, Halpern AC.Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP. Melanoma. Dermatology. 2008;22nd edSpain: Mosby;1745–1771.
    1. Menzies SW, Moloney FJ, Byth K, et al. Dermoscopic evaluation of nodular melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:699–709. - PubMed
    1. Saldanha G, Potter L, Daforno P, et al. Cutaneous melanoma subtypes show different BRAF and NRAS mutation frequencies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4499–4505. - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Choi JW, Kim YS. Frequencies of BRAF and NRAS mutations are different in histological types and sites of origin of cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:776–784. - PubMed
    1. Sullivan RJ, Flaherty KT. Resistance to BRAF-target therapy in melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1297–1304. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms