Primary care access for new patients on the eve of health care reform
- PMID: 24710808
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.20
Primary care access for new patients on the eve of health care reform
Abstract
Importance: Current measures of access to care have intrinsic limitations and may not accurately reflect the capacity of the primary care system to absorb new patients.
Objective: To assess primary care appointment availability by state and insurance status.
Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a simulated patient study. Trained field staff, randomly assigned to private insurance, Medicaid, or uninsured, called primary care offices requesting the first available appointment for either routine care or an urgent health concern. The study included a stratified random sample of primary care practices treating nonelderly adults within each of 10 states (Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Texas), selected for diversity along numerous dimensions. Collectively, these states comprise almost one-third of the US nonelderly, Medicaid, and currently uninsured populations. Sampling was based on enrollment by insurance type by county. Analyses were weighted to obtain population-based estimates for each state.
Main outcomes and measures: The ability to schedule an appointment and number of days to the appointment. We also examined cost and payment required at the visit for the uninsured.
Results: Between November 13, 2012, and April 4, 2013, we made 12,907 calls to 7788 primary care practices requesting new patient appointments. Across the 10 states, 84.7% (95% CI, 82.6%-86.8%) of privately insured and 57.9% (95% CI, 54.8%-61.0%) of Medicaid callers received an appointment. Appointment rates were 78.8% (95% CI, 75.6%-82.0%) for uninsured patients with full cash payment but only 15.4% (95% CI, 13.2%-17.6%) if payment required at the time of the visit was restricted to $75 or less. Conditional on getting an appointment, median wait times were typically less than 1 week (2 weeks in Massachusetts), with no differences by insurance status or urgency of health concern.
Conclusions and relevance: Although most primary care physicians are accepting new patients, access varies widely across states and insurance status. Navigator programs are needed, not only to help patients enroll but also to identify practices accepting new patients within each plan's network. Tracking new patient appointment availability over time can inform policies designed to strengthen primary care capacity and enhance the effectiveness of the coverage expansions with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Comment in
-
Calling all doctors: what type of insurance do you accept?JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):869-70. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13421. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24710694 No abstract available.
-
Access to primary care in England.JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):467. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7853. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25730575 No abstract available.
-
Access to primary care in England--reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):467-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7871. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25730576 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Access to Primary Care Appointments Following 2014 Insurance Expansions.Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):107-112. doi: 10.1370/afm.2043. Ann Fam Med. 2017. PMID: 28289108 Free PMC article.
-
Access points for the underserved: primary care appointment availability at federally qualified health centers in 10 States.Med Care. 2014 Sep;52(9):818-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000184. Med Care. 2014. PMID: 25072878
-
Primary Care Appointment Availability for Medicaid Patients: Comparing Traditional and Premium Assistance Plans.Med Care. 2016 Sep;54(9):878-83. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000573. Med Care. 2016. PMID: 27517123
-
Medicaid Patients Have Greater Difficulty Scheduling Health Care Appointments Compared With Private Insurance Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019838118. doi: 10.1177/0046958019838118. Inquiry. 2019. PMID: 30947608 Free PMC article.
-
A Primary Care Panel Size of 2500 Is neither Accurate nor Reasonable.J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;29(4):496-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150317. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016. PMID: 27390381 Review.
Cited by
-
Lending a Hand to Health Care Disparities: A Cross-sectional Study of Variations in Reimbursement for Common Hand Procedures.Hand (N Y). 2020 Jul;15(4):556-562. doi: 10.1177/1558944718825320. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Hand (N Y). 2020. PMID: 30724594 Free PMC article.
-
Access to Primary Care Clinics for Patients With Chronic Pain Receiving Opioids.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6928. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31298712 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Office-Based Physician Participation in Medicaid Managed Care and Health Insurance Exchange Plans in the Same US Geographic Markets.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202727. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2727. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32282047 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Simulated Patient Race/Ethnicity With Scheduling of Primary Care Appointments.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920010. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20010. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 31995215 Free PMC article.
-
Testing the Validity of Primary Care Physicians' Self-Reported Acceptance of New Patients by Insurance Status.Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):1515-32. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12435. Epub 2016 Jan 14. Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 26762212 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous