Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e94130.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094130. eCollection 2014.

Influenza forecasting in human populations: a scoping review

Affiliations

Influenza forecasting in human populations: a scoping review

Jean-Paul Chretien et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Forecasts of influenza activity in human populations could help guide key preparedness tasks. We conducted a scoping review to characterize these methodological approaches and identify research gaps. Adapting the PRISMA methodology for systematic reviews, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Project Euclid, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for publications in English since January 1, 2000 using the terms "influenza AND (forecast* OR predict*)", excluding studies that did not validate forecasts against independent data or incorporate influenza-related surveillance data from the season or pandemic for which the forecasts were applied. We included 35 publications describing population-based (N = 27), medical facility-based (N = 4), and regional or global pandemic spread (N = 4) forecasts. They included areas of North America (N = 15), Europe (N = 14), and/or Asia-Pacific region (N = 4), or had global scope (N = 3). Forecasting models were statistical (N = 18) or epidemiological (N = 17). Five studies used data assimilation methods to update forecasts with new surveillance data. Models used virological (N = 14), syndromic (N = 13), meteorological (N = 6), internet search query (N = 4), and/or other surveillance data as inputs. Forecasting outcomes and validation metrics varied widely. Two studies compared distinct modeling approaches using common data, 2 assessed model calibration, and 1 systematically incorporated expert input. Of the 17 studies using epidemiological models, 8 included sensitivity analysis. This review suggests need for use of good practices in influenza forecasting (e.g., sensitivity analysis); direct comparisons of diverse approaches; assessment of model calibration; integration of subjective expert input; operational research in pilot, real-world applications; and improved mutual understanding among modelers and public health officials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Literature search flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Some needs for advancement of influenza forecasting.

References

    1. World Health Organization website. Influenza fact sheet. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs211/en/index.html. Accessed 2014 Mar 19.
    1. World Health Organization website. Influenza virus infections in humans. Available: http://www.who.int/influenza/GIP_InfluenzaVirusInfectionsHumans_Jul13.pdf. Accessed 2014 Mar 19.
    1. Dorjee S, Poljak Z, Revie CW, Bridgland J, McNab B, et al. (2013) A review of simulation modelling approaches used for the spread of zoonotic influenza viruses in animal and human populations. Zoonoses Public Health 60: 383–411 10.1111/zph.12010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee VJ, Lye DC, Wilder-Smith A (2009) Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies. BMC Med 7: 76 10.1186/1741-7015-7-76 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prieto DM, Das TK, Savachkin AA, Uribe A, Izurieta R, et al. (2012) A systematic review to identify areas of enhancements of pandemic simulation models for operational use at provincial and local levels. BMC Public Health 12: 251 10.1186/1471-2458-12-251 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types