Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e94063.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094063. eCollection 2014.

Breast cancer "tailored follow-up" in Italian oncology units: a web-based survey

Collaborators, Affiliations

Breast cancer "tailored follow-up" in Italian oncology units: a web-based survey

Clara Natoli et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer follow-up procedures after primary treatment are still a controversial issue. Aim of this study was to investigate, through a web-based survey, surveillance methodologies selected by Italian oncologists in everyday clinical practice.

Methods: Referents of Italian medical oncology units were invited to participate to the study via e-mail through the SurveyMonkey website. Participants were asked how, in their institution, exams of disease staging and follow-up are planned in asymptomatic women and if surveillance continues beyond the 5th year.

Results: Between February and May 2013, 125 out of 233 (53.6%) invited referents of Italian medical oncology units agreed to participate in the survey. Ninety-seven (77.6%) referents state that modalities of breast cancer follow-up are planned according to the risk of disease progression at diagnosis and only 12 (9.6%) oncology units apply the minimal follow-up procedures according to international guidelines. Minimal follow-up is never applied in high risk asymptomatic women. Ninety-eight (78.4%) oncology units continue follow-up in all patients beyond 5 years.

Conclusions: Our survey shows that 90.4% of participating Italian oncology units declare they do not apply the minimal breast cancer follow-up procedures after primary treatment in asymptomatic women, as suggested by national and international guidelines. Interestingly, about 80.0% of interviewed referents performs the so called "tailored follow-up", high intensity for high risk, low intensity for low risk patients. There is an urgent need of randomized clinical trials able to determine the effectiveness of risk-based follow-up modalities, their ideal frequency and persistence in time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tumor characteristics considered relevant to classify patients at high risk of disease progression.

References

    1. Hayes DF (2007) Clinical practice. Follow-up of patients with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356: 2505–2513. - PubMed
    1. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. JAMA 271: 1587–1592. - PubMed
    1. Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, et al. (1999) Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer Follow-up. JAMA 281: 1586. - PubMed
    1. Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, Ciatto S, Pacini P, et al. (1994) Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. JAMA 271: 1593–1597. - PubMed
    1. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, et al. (2005) Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD001768 - PubMed

Publication types