Refining reproductive parameters for modelling sustainability and extinction in hunted primate populations in the Amazon
- PMID: 24714614
- PMCID: PMC3979925
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093625
Refining reproductive parameters for modelling sustainability and extinction in hunted primate populations in the Amazon
Erratum in
-
Correction: Refining Reproductive Parameters for Modelling Sustainability and Extinction in Hunted Primate Populations in the Amazon.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0131030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131030. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26076484 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Primates are frequently hunted in Amazonia. Assessing the sustainability of hunting is essential to conservation planning. The most-used sustainability model, the 'Production Model', and more recent spatial models, rely on basic reproductive parameters for accuracy. These parameters are often crudely estimated. To date, parameters used for the Amazon's most-hunted primate, the woolly monkey (Lagothrix spp.), come from captive populations in the 1960s, when captive births were rare. Furthermore, woolly monkeys have since been split into five species. We provide reproductive parameters calculated by examining the reproductive organs of female Poeppig's woolly monkeys (Lagothrix poeppigii), collected by hunters as part of their normal subsistence activity. Production was 0.48-0.54 young per female per year, and an interbirth interval of 22.3 to 25.2 months, similar to parameters from captive populations. However, breeding was seasonal, which imposes limits on the maximum reproductive rate attainable. We recommend the use of spatial models over the Production Model, since they are less sensitive to error in estimated reproductive rates. Further refinements to reproductive parameters are needed for most primate taxa. Methods like ours verify the suitability of captive reproductive rates for sustainability analysis and population modelling for populations under differing conditions of hunting pressure and seasonality. Without such research, population modelling is based largely on guesswork.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Fitz Gibbon C (1998). The management of subsistence harvesting: behavioural ecology of hunter and their mammalian prey. In: Caro T, editor. Behavioural Ecology and Conservation Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 449–474.
-
- Shepard GH (2002) Primates in Matsigenka subsistence and worldview. In: Fuentes A, Wolfe L, editors. Primates Face to Face. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 101–136.
-
- Puertas P, Bodmer RE (2004) Hunting Effort as a Tool for Community-Based Wildlife Management in Amazonia. In: Silvius K, Bodmer RE, Fragoso JMV. People in Nature. Columbia University Press, New York. 123–137.
-
- da Silva MNF, Shepard GH, Yu DW (2005) Conservation implications of primate hunting practices among the Matsigenka of Manu National Park. Neotropical Primates 13: 31–36.
-
- Urbani B (2005) The targeted monkey: a re-evaluation of predation on New World primates. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 83: 89–109.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
