Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e93762.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093762. eCollection 2014.

Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators

Collaborators, Affiliations

Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators

Maaike L De Roo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Dying at home and dying at the preferred place of death are advocated to be desirable outcomes of palliative care. More insight is needed in their usefulness as quality indicators. Our objective is to describe whether "the percentage of patients dying at home" and "the percentage of patients who died in their place of preference" are feasible and informative quality indicators.

Methods and findings: A mortality follow-back study was conducted, based on data recorded by representative GP networks regarding home-dwelling patients who died non-suddenly in Belgium (n = 1036), The Netherlands (n = 512), Italy (n = 1639) or Spain (n = 565). "The percentage of patients dying at home" ranged between 35.3% (Belgium) and 50.6% (The Netherlands) in the four countries, while "the percentage of patients dying at their preferred place of death" ranged between 67.8% (Italy) and 86.0% (Spain). Both indicators were strongly associated with palliative care provision by the GP (odds ratios of 1.55-13.23 and 2.30-6.63, respectively). The quality indicator concerning the preferred place of death offers a broader view than the indicator concerning home deaths, as it takes into account all preferences met in all locations. However, GPs did not know the preferences for place of death in 39.6% (The Netherlands) to 70.3% (Italy), whereas the actual place of death was known in almost all cases.

Conclusion: GPs know their patients' actual place of death, making the percentage of home deaths a feasible indicator for collection by GPs. However, patients' preferred place of death was often unknown to the GP. We therefore recommend using information from relatives as long as information from GPs on the preferred place of death is lacking. Timely communication about the place where patients want to be cared for at the end of life remains a challenge for GPs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the sample selection.
*We excluded patients if place of residence was known for ≤15 days in the last month of life OR if place of residence was known for <30 days and a transition took place during this period.

References

    1. Bell CL, Somogyi-Zalud E, Masaki KH (2009) Methodological review: measured and reported congruence between preferred and actual place of death. Palliat Med 23: 482–490. - PubMed
    1. Billingham MJ, Billingham SJ (2013) Congruence between preferred and actual place of death according to the presence of malignant or non-malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 3: 144–154. - PubMed
    1. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson I (2013) Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 12: 7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gomes B, Higginson IJ, Calanzani N, Cohen J, Deliens L, et al. (2012) Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol 23: 2006–2015. - PubMed
    1. Gomes B, Higginson IJ (2006) Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. BMJ 332: 515–521. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types