Comprehensive evaluation of hemostasis in normal women: impact on the diagnosis of mild bleeding disorders
- PMID: 24715368
- DOI: 10.1177/1076029614527495
Comprehensive evaluation of hemostasis in normal women: impact on the diagnosis of mild bleeding disorders
Abstract
Women with mild bleeding disorders (MBDs) pose a diagnostic challenge and menorrhagia, the most common presenting symptom that remains underreported. We tested the hypothesis that screening apparently normal females using general and gynecological bleeding assessment tools and a global hemostatic assay together with platelet aggregation can help predict MBDs. We assessed 47 women using electronic bleeding assessment tools; e-bleeding questionnaire; and e-Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (e-PBAC) based on previously validated methods, thrombelastography (TEG), and platelet aggregation together with basic coagulation testing. Three women had elevated bleeding score with von Willebrand disease diagnosis confirmed in one case and eleven cases had elevated e-PBAC. We report normal ranges for TEG and platelet aggregation in women during the first half of the menstrual cycle and show 23.4% of apparently normal women may have general or heavy menstrual bleeding. This is a prelude to a larger study to determine the validity of bleeding assessment tools in screening for MBDs in women.
Keywords: PBAC; electronic bleeding questionnaire; menorrhagia; thromboelastography; women bleeding.
© The Author(s) 2014.
Similar articles
-
Screening hemostatic defects in Saudi University students with unexplained menorrhagia: a diagnosis, which could be missed.Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2021 Jun 1;32(4):278-284. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001033. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2021. PMID: 33741756
-
Diagnostic challenges of inherited mild bleeding disorders: a bait for poorly explored clinical and basic research.J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Feb;17(2):257-270. doi: 10.1111/jth.14363. Epub 2019 Jan 21. J Thromb Haemost. 2019. PMID: 30562407 Review.
-
Development of a screening tool for identifying women with menorrhagia for hemostatic evaluation.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;198(2):163.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.070. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18226613
-
The condensed MCMDM-1 VWD bleeding questionnaire as a predictor of bleeding disorders in women with unexplained menorrhagia.Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2012 Jun;23(4):311-5. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835274d9. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2012. PMID: 22450545
-
Bleeding symptom assessment and hemostasis evaluation of menorrhagia.Curr Opin Hematol. 2008 Sep;15(5):465-72. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32830a4ed4. Curr Opin Hematol. 2008. PMID: 18695369 Review.
Cited by
-
Hemostatic profile detailing in apparent VWD cases: A cross sectional study.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Dec;28(12):6701-6704. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.044. Epub 2021 Jul 19. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34866968 Free PMC article.
-
Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review.BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-0887-y. BMC Womens Health. 2020. PMID: 32041594 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of methods to measure menstrual blood loss.BMC Womens Health. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0627-8. BMC Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 30134884 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources