Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR
- PMID: 24718329
- DOI: 10.2166/wst.2014.007
Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR
Abstract
In this study, three laboratory scale submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs) comprising a conventional MBR (C-MBR), moving bed MBR (MB-MBR) and anoxic-oxic MBR (A/O-MBR) were continuously operated with synthesized domestic wastewater (chemical oxygen demand, COD = 500 mg/L) for 150 days under similar operational and environmental conditions. Kaldnes(®) plastic media with 20% dry volume was used as a biofilm carrier in the MB-MBR and A/O-MBR. The treatment performance and fouling propensity of the MBRs were evaluated. The effect of cake layer formation in all three MBRs was almost the same. However, pore blocking caused a major difference in the resultant water flux. The A/O-MBR showed the highest total nitrogen and phosphorus (PO4-P) removal efficiencies of 83.2 and 69.7%, respectively. Due to the high removal of nitrogen, fewer protein contents were found in the soluble and bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of the A/O-MBR. Fouling trends of the MBRs showed 12, 14 and 20 days filtration cycles for C-MBR, MB-MBR and A/O-MBR, respectively. A 25% reduction of the soluble EPS and a 37% reduction of the bound EPS concentrations in A/O-MBR compared with C-MBR was a major contributing factor for fouling retardation and the enhanced filtration capacity of the A/O-MBR.
Similar articles
-
Membrane fouling mitigation in different biofilm membrane bioreactors with pre-anoxic tanks for treating mariculture wastewater.Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 1;724:138311. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138311. Epub 2020 Mar 30. Sci Total Environ. 2020. PMID: 32272414
-
Influence of biofilm carriers on membrane fouling propensity in moving biofilm membrane bioreactor.Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jun;113:161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.033. Epub 2012 Jan 28. Bioresour Technol. 2012. PMID: 22342044
-
Performance evaluation and bacterial characterization of membrane bioreactors.Bioresour Technol. 2013 Aug;141:2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.140. Epub 2013 Feb 4. Bioresour Technol. 2013. PMID: 23453983
-
Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?Water Res. 2013 Oct 1;47(15):5447-63. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.033. Epub 2013 Jun 27. Water Res. 2013. PMID: 23863390 Review.
-
Membrane fouling control in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) using granular materials.Bioresour Technol. 2017 Sep;240:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 6. Bioresour Technol. 2017. PMID: 28314664 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring the Function of Quorum Sensing Regulated Biofilms in Biological Wastewater Treatment: A Review.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 28;23(17):9751. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179751. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36077148 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous