Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 18;10(4):367-76.
doi: 10.7150/ijbs.8048. eCollection 2014.

Systemic blockage of nitric oxide synthase by L-NAME increases left ventricular systolic pressure, which is not augmented further by Intralipid®

Affiliations

Systemic blockage of nitric oxide synthase by L-NAME increases left ventricular systolic pressure, which is not augmented further by Intralipid®

Il-Woo Shin et al. Int J Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Intravenous lipid emulsions (LEs) are effective in the treatment of toxicity associated with various drugs such as local anesthetics and other lipid soluble agents. The goals of this study were to examine the effect of LE on left ventricular hemodynamic variables and systemic blood pressure in an in vivo rat model, and to determine the associated cellular mechanism with a particular focus on nitric oxide. Two LEs (Intralipid(®) 20% and Lipofundin(®) MCT/LCT 20%) or normal saline were administered intravenously in an in vivo rat model following induction of anesthesia by intramuscular injection of tiletamine/zolazepam and xylazine. Left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), blood pressure, heart rate, maximum rate of intraventricular pressure increase, and maximum rate of intraventricular pressure decrease were measured before and after intravenous administration of various doses of LEs or normal saline to an in vivo rat with or without pretreatment with the non-specific nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME). Administration of Intralipid(®) (3 and 10 ml/kg) increased LVSP and decreased heart rate. Pretreatment with L-NAME (10 mg/kg) increased LSVP and decreased heart rate, whereas subsequent treatment with Intralipid(®) did not significantly alter LVSP. Intralipid(®) (10 ml/kg) increased mean blood pressure and decreased heart rate. The increase in LVSP induced by Lipofundin(®) MCT/LCT was greater than that induced by Intralipid(®). Intralipid(®) (1%) did not significantly alter nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside-induced relaxation in endothelium-denuded rat aorta. Taken together, systemic blockage of nitric oxide synthase by L-NAME increases LVSP, which is not augmented further by intralipid(®).

Keywords: L-NAME.; blood pressure; left ventricular systolic pressure; lipid emulsion; nitric oxide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Il-Woo Shin is currently receiving both a grant (KRF-2012-1035) from National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and a grant (GNUHCRF-2012-012) from the Gyeongsang National University Hospital. The remaining authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of Intralipid® 20% (1.5 and 3 ml/kg) or normal saline on left ventricular hemodynamic variables including left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP, A), heart rate (HR, B), maximum rate of intraventricular pressure increase (+dP/dtmax, C), and maximum rate of intraventricular pressure decrease (-dP/dtmax, D) in an in vivo rat model. Control group: normal saline (3 ml/kg) was infused intravenously. Values are expressed as the percentage of baseline hemodynamic variables before administration of normal saline or Intralipid® and shown as means ± SD (n = 8/group). n indicates the number of rats. ***P < 0.001 and *P < 0.05 versus control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of Intralipid® 20% (10 ml/kg) or normal saline on left ventricular hemodynamic variables including left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP, A), heart rate (HR, B), maximum rate of intraventricular pressure increase (+dP/dtmax, C), and maximum rate of intraventricular pressure decrease (-dP/dtmax, D) in an in vivo rat model. Control group: normal saline (10 ml/kg) was infused intravenously. Values are expressed as the percentage of baseline hemodynamic variables before administration of normal saline or Intralipid® and are shown as means ± SD (n = 10/group). n indicates the number of rats. **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05 versus control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of cumulative administration (0.3 to 10 ml/kg) of two lipid emulsions (Intralipid® 20% and Lipofundin® MCT/LCT [medium chain triglycerides/long-chain triglycerides] 20%) and normal saline on left ventricular hemodynamic variables, including left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP, A), heart rate (HR, B), maximum rate of intraventricular pressure increase (+dP/dtmax, C) and maximum rate of intraventricular pressure decrease (-dP/dtmax, D) in an in vivo rat model. Values are expressed as the percentage of baseline hemodynamic variables before the administration of normal saline or lipid emulsion and shown as means ± SD (n = 6/group). n indicates the number of rats. A: *P < 0.001 versus control. †P < 0.01 and ‡P < 0.05 versus Intralipid®. B: *P < 0.05 and †P < 0.01 versus control. C: *P < 0.001 versus control. †P < 0.05 versus Intralipid®. D: *P < 0.001, †P < 0.01, and ‡P < 0.05 versus control.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative Nω-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME) dose-left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) response curves in an in vivo rat model. Values are expressed as the percentage of baseline LVSP before administration of L-NAME and are shown as mean ± SD (n = 8). n indicates the number of rats. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus baseline.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The effects of subsequent administration of Intralipid® 20% (3 ml/kg) on hemodynamic variables including left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP, A), heart rate (HR, B), maximum rate of intraventricular pressure increase (+dP/dtmax, C) and maximum rate of intraventricular pressure decrease (-dP/dtmax, D) in an in vivo rat model pretreated with Nω-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME, 10 mg/kg), as described in Methods. Values are expressed as the percentage of baseline hemodynamic variable before the administration of L-NAME and are shown as means ± SD (n = 7/group). n indicates the number of rats. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05 compared with baseline.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The effects of administration of Intralipid® 20% (10 ml/kg) on hemodynamic variables including left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP, A), heart rate (HR, B), maximum rate of intraventricular pressure increase (+dP/dtmax, C), and maximum rate of intraventricular pressure decrease (-dP/dtmax, D) in an in vivo rat model after pretreatment with Nω-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME, 10 mg/kg), as described in Methods. Values are expressed as the percentage of baseline hemodynamic variable before the administration of L-NAME and are shown as means ± SD (n = 8/group). n indicates the number of rats. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05 compared with baseline. P < 0.01 compared with L-NAME (10 mg/kg) alone.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effect of Intralipid® 20% (10 ml/kg) or normal saline on mean blood pressure (MBP, A), heart rate (HR, B), systolic blood pressure (SBP, C), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, D) in an in vivo rat model. Control group: normal saline (10 ml/kg) was infused intravenously. Values are expressed as the percentage of baseline hemodynamic variables before administration of normal saline or Intralipid® and are shown as means ± SD (n = 7/group). n indicates the number of rats. ***P < 0.001 and **P < 0.01 versus control.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Effect of Intralipid® (1%) on sodium nitroprusside-induced relaxation in isolated endothelium-denuded rat aorta. Values are expressed as the percentage relaxation of precontraction induced by phenylephrine (10-7 M) and are shown as mean ± SD (n = 6/group). n indicates the number of rats.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cave G, Harvey M, Graudins A. Intravenous lipid emulsion as antidote: a summary of published human experience. Emerg Med Australas. 2011;23:123–141. - PubMed
    1. Rothschild L, Bern S, Oswald S. et al. Intravenous lipid emulsion in clinical toxicology. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:51. (available at: http://www.sjtrem.com/content/18/1/51. Accessed August 13, 2013) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinberg GL. Lipid emulsion infusion. Resuscitation for local anesthetic and other drug overdose. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:180–187. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dix SK, Rosner GF, Nayar M. et al. Intractable cardiac arrest due to lidocaine toxicity successfully resuscitated with lipid emulsion. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:872–874. - PubMed
    1. Foxall G, McCahon R, Lamb J. et al. Levobupivacaine-induced seizures and cardiovascular collapse treated with Intralipid. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:516–518. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources