Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;95(7):1262-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

Pilot randomized controlled trial of self-regulation in promoting function in acute poststroke patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pilot randomized controlled trial of self-regulation in promoting function in acute poststroke patients

Karen P Y Liu et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To test the efficacy of self-regulation (SR) for promoting task performance and motor and cognitive functions.

Design: Pilot randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Rehabilitation unit.

Participants: Inpatients with acute poststroke (N=44) after a cerebral infarction aged ≥60 years.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to the SR (n=24) or functional rehabilitation (control; n=20) intervention. The SR intervention consisted of 1 week of therapist-supervised practices of daily tasks using SR of one's own performance (five 1-h sessions). Patients in the control intervention practiced the same daily tasks with a therapist's demonstration and guidance.

Main outcome measures: Performance of tasks, including household and monetary transaction tasks; FIM; Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA); and Color Trails Test (CTT).

Results: The SR group showed significant improvement in all tasks (median difference, 1-2; effect size [r]=.74-.89) versus none (median difference, 0-0.5) in the control group. Results of the FIM (P<.001, r=.87 in the motor subscale; P<.001, r=.49 in the cognitive subscale), FMA (P<.001, r=.84 for upper extremity motor function and r=.63 for lower extremity motor function), and CTT (P=.002, r=.72) of the SR group improved. The SR group outperformed their control counterparts in 4 of the 5 tasks (median difference, 1; r=.30-.52) and in the FIM motor subscale (P=.002, r=.47), but not in the cognitive subscale and motor and cognitive functions.

Conclusions: SR appears useful for improving task performance that demands both motor and cognitive abilities by promoting information processing and active learning.

Keywords: Occupational therapy; Randomized controlled trial as topic; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources