Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 15;189(2):193-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: are we there yet?

Timothy M Rankin  1 , Nicholas A Giovinco  2 , Daniel J Cucher  1 , George Watts  3 , Bonnie Hurwitz  4 , David G Armstrong  5
Affiliations

Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: are we there yet?

Timothy M Rankin et al. J Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: The applications for rapid prototyping have expanded dramatically over the last 20 y. In recent years, additive manufacturing has been intensely investigated for surgical implants, tissue scaffolds, and organs. There is, however, scant literature to date that has investigated the viability of three-dimensional (3D) printing of surgical instruments.

Materials and methods: Using a fused deposition modeling printer, an Army/Navy surgical retractor was replicated from polylactic acid (PLA) filament. The retractor was sterilized using standard Food and Drug Administration approved glutaraldehyde protocols, tested for bacteria by polymerase chain reaction, and stressed until fracture to determine if the printed instrument could tolerate force beyond the demands of an operating room (OR).

Results: Printing required roughly 90 min. The instrument tolerated 13.6 kg of tangential force before failure, both before and after exposure to the sterilant. Freshly extruded PLA from the printer was sterile and produced no polymerase chain reaction product. Each instrument weighed 16 g and required only $0.46 of PLA.

Conclusions: Our estimates place the cost per unit of a 3D-printed retractor to be roughly 1/10th the cost of a stainless steel instrument. The PLA Army/Navy retractor is strong enough for the demands of the OR. Freshly extruded PLA in a clean environment, such as an OR, would produce a sterile ready-to-use instrument. Because of the unprecedented accessibility of 3D printing technology world wide and the cost efficiency of these instruments, there are far reaching implications for surgery in some underserved and less developed parts of the world.

Keywords: 3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Instruments; Polylactic acid (PLA); Printing surgical instruments; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two printed replicas of the poly lactic acid surgical prototypes after being printed.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Zein N, et al. 3-dimentional (3D) print of liver for preoperative planning in live donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013 Aug 20; - PubMed
    1. Klein G, Lu Y, Wang M. 3D printing and neurosurgery--ready for prime time? World Neurosurg. 2013 Sep-Oct;80(3-4):233–5. - PubMed
    1. Giovinco N, et al. A novel combination of printed 3-dimensional anatomic templates and computer-assisted surgical simulation for virtual preoperative planning in Charcot foot reconstruction. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 May-Jun;51(3):387–93. - PubMed
    1. Michael S, et al. Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57741. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meseguer-Olmo L, et al. In-vivo behavior of Si-hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone/DMB scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Jul;101(7):2038–48. - PubMed