Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 May;259(5):833-41.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000438.

Benchmarking outcomes in the critically injured burn patient

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Benchmarking outcomes in the critically injured burn patient

Matthew B Klein et al. Ann Surg. 2014 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine and compare outcomes with accepted benchmarks in burn care at 6 academic burn centers.

Background: Since the 1960s, US morbidity and mortality rates have declined tremendously for burn patients, likely related to improvements in surgical and critical care treatment. We describe the baseline patient characteristics and well-defined outcomes for major burn injuries.

Methods: We followed 300 adults and 241 children from 2003 to 2009 through hospitalization, using standard operating procedures developed at study onset. We created an extensive database on patient and injury characteristics, anatomic and physiological derangement, clinical treatment, and outcomes. These data were compared with existing benchmarks in burn care.

Results: Study patients were critically injured, as demonstrated by mean % total body surface area (TBSA) (41.2 ± 18.3 for adults and 57.8 ± 18.2 for children) and presence of inhalation injury in 38% of the adults and 54.8% of the children. Mortality in adults was 14.1% for those younger than 55 years and 38.5% for those aged 55 years and older. Mortality in patients younger than 17 years was 7.9%. Overall, the multiple organ failure rate was 27%. When controlling for age and % TBSA, presence of inhalation injury continues to be significant.

Conclusions: This study provides the current benchmark for major burn patients. Mortality rates, notwithstanding significant % TBSA and presence of inhalation injury, have significantly declined compared with previous benchmarks. Modern day surgical and medically intensive management has markedly improved to the point where we can expect patients younger than 55 years with severe burn injuries and inhalation injury to survive these devastating conditions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00257244.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

For all authors, none were declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mortality versus age and % TBSA
Mortality rates were plotted versus age (panel A) and % TBSA (panel B). The Lethal Dose 50 (LD50) is shown for each.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Mortality versus age and % TBSA
Mortality rates were plotted versus age (panel A) and % TBSA (panel B). The Lethal Dose 50 (LD50) is shown for each.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mortality for Glue Grant study patients compared with the NBR
Panel A shows the mortality rate by year for those patients in the Glue Grant study. Comparisons of mortality rates by TBSA quintile and age group (<50 years old versus ≥50 years old) for those patients in the Glue Grant with those in the NBR are shown in panel B.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mortality for Glue Grant study patients compared with the NBR
Panel A shows the mortality rate by year for those patients in the Glue Grant study. Comparisons of mortality rates by TBSA quintile and age group (<50 years old versus ≥50 years old) for those patients in the Glue Grant with those in the NBR are shown in panel B.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time to Recovery
(A) To the left of panel A, the age and burn size were plotted for each of the 541 patients in the Glue Grant study. From top to bottom, the centroid was plotted for age and burn size. To the right of panel B, the Denver organ failure scores were plotted for each time period up to 200 days. The patients can be considered as having no organ failure, in organ failure, or dead. There are four categories shown by Denver organ failure scores: no organ failure – 0 (blue), organ failure – 1–3 (purple), multiple organ failure – ≥4 (red), and dead (black). (B) The Kaplan-Meyer mortality curves and the organ recovery curves over the year post-injury are shown. At each time point, there are four patient possibilities plotted as the proportion of the total population: multiple organ failure (below dashed curve), organ failure (above dashed curve and below dotted curve), fully recovered (above dotted curve and below solid curve), or dead (above solid curve).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time to Recovery
(A) To the left of panel A, the age and burn size were plotted for each of the 541 patients in the Glue Grant study. From top to bottom, the centroid was plotted for age and burn size. To the right of panel B, the Denver organ failure scores were plotted for each time period up to 200 days. The patients can be considered as having no organ failure, in organ failure, or dead. There are four categories shown by Denver organ failure scores: no organ failure – 0 (blue), organ failure – 1–3 (purple), multiple organ failure – ≥4 (red), and dead (black). (B) The Kaplan-Meyer mortality curves and the organ recovery curves over the year post-injury are shown. At each time point, there are four patient possibilities plotted as the proportion of the total population: multiple organ failure (below dashed curve), organ failure (above dashed curve and below dotted curve), fully recovered (above dotted curve and below solid curve), or dead (above solid curve).

Comment in

References

    1. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. [[cited July 24, 2013]];2010 Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/web_tables.htm#2010.
    1. Guidelines for the Operation of Burn Centers. American Burn Association. 2006 Available from http://www.ameriburn.org/verification_about.php.
    1. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR. Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
    1. Tompkins RG, Burke JF, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Prompt eschar excision: a treatment system contributing to reduced burn mortality. A statistical evaluation of burn care at the Massachusetts General Hospital (1974–1984) Ann Surg. 1986;204:272–281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tompkins RG, Remensnyder JP, Burke JF, et al. Significant reductions in mortality for children with burn injuries through the use of prompt eschar excision. Ann Surg. 1988;208:577–585. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data