Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr 10;8(4):e2655.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002655. eCollection 2014 Apr.

PCR-based techniques for leprosy diagnosis: from the laboratory to the clinic

Affiliations
Review

PCR-based techniques for leprosy diagnosis: from the laboratory to the clinic

Alejandra Nóbrega Martinez et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

In leprosy, classic diagnostic tools based on bacillary counts and histopathology have been facing hurdles, especially in distinguishing latent infection from active disease and diagnosing paucibacillary clinical forms. Serological tests and IFN-gamma releasing assays (IGRA) that employ humoral and cellular immune parameters, respectively, are also being used, but recent results indicate that quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a key technique due to its higher sensitivity and specificity. In fact, advances concerning the structure and function of the Mycobacterium leprae genome led to the development of specific PCR-based gene amplification assays for leprosy diagnosis and monitoring of household contacts. Also, based on the validation of point-of-care technologies for M. tuberculosis DNA detection, it is clear that the same advantages of rapid DNA detection could be observed in respect to leprosy. So far, PCR has proven useful in the determination of transmission routes, M. leprae viability, and drug resistance in leprosy. However, PCR has been ascertained to be especially valuable in diagnosing difficult cases like pure neural leprosy (PNL), paucibacillary (PB), and patients with atypical clinical presentation and histopathological features compatible with leprosy. Also, the detection of M. leprae DNA in different samples of the household contacts of leprosy patients is very promising. Although a positive PCR result is not sufficient to establish a causal relationship with disease outcome, quantitation provided by qPCR is clearly capable of indicating increased risk of developing the disease and could alert clinicians to follow these contacts more closely or even define rules for chemoprophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Talhari S, Grossi MA, de Oliveira ML, Gontijo B, Talhari C, et al. (2012) Hansen's disease: a vanishing disease? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 107 Suppl 1: 13–16. - PubMed
    1. Truman RW, Singh P, Sharma R, Busso P, Rougemont J, et al. (2011) Probable zoonotic leprosy in the southern United States. N Engl J Med 364: 1626–1633. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hacker Mde A, Duppre NC, Nery JA, Sales AM, Sarno EN (2012) Characteristics of leprosy diagnosed through the surveillance of contacts: a comparison with index cases in Rio de Janeiro, 1987–2010. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 107 Suppl 1: 49–54. - PubMed
    1. Ezenduka C, Post E, John S, Suraj A, Namadi A, et al. (2012) Cost-effectiveness analysis of three leprosy case detection methods in Northern Nigeria. PLOS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1818. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duthie MS, Truman RW, Goto W, O'Donnell J, Hay MN, et al. (2011) Insight toward early diagnosis of leprosy through analysis of the developing antibody responses of Mycobacterium leprae-infected armadillos. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18: 254–259. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms