Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jul;472(7):2237-44.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3587-9. Epub 2014 Apr 11.

Hospital costs of total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Hospital costs of total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip

Ali Ashraf et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a leading cause of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in younger patients. It is unknown how the hospital costs of THA in patients with DDH compare with patients with degenerative arthritis.

Questions/purposes: We undertook this study to determine (1) the hospital cost and length of stay associated with primary THA in patients with dysplasia compared with nondysplastic control subjects; (2) the hospital cost and length of stay of THA in severely dysplastic hips compared with mildly dysplastic hips; and (3) perioperative complications in patients with DDH compared with patients without dysplasia.

Methods: This matched-cohort study included 354 patients undergoing primary THA for DDH and 1029 age-, sex-, and calendar year-matched patients undergoing THA for primary osteoarthritis between 2000 and 2008. DDH severity was measured by the Crowe classification. An institutional database was used to calculate the cost of care. Using line item details (date, type, frequency, and billed charge) for every procedure or service billed at our institution for each patient, bottom-up microcosting valuation techniques were used to generate standardized inflation-adjusted estimates of the cost of each service or procedure in constant dollars. Generalized linear random effects models were used to compare length of stay and costs during hospitalization and the 90-day period after surgery. Query of a longitudinal institutional database was used to identify documented complications.

Results: Patients with DDH undergoing primary THA incurred higher hospital costs than patients with primary osteoarthritis (USD 16,949 versus USD 16,485, p = 0.012). Operating room costs (USD 3471 versus USD 3417, p = 0.0085) and implant costs (USD 3896 versus USD 3493, p < 0.001) were higher in the DDH group compared with the osteoarthritis group. Length of stay was not different between the two groups (4 versus 4 days, p = 0.46). Crowe 4 hips had higher hospital costs than Crowe 1 hips (USD 21,246 versus USD 16,345, p < 0.001) with an associated longer length of stay (5 days versus 4 days, p = 0.0011) and higher implant costs (USD 4380 versus USD 3788, p = 0.0012). There was no detectible difference in 90-day complications in the case group compared with patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis.

Conclusions: Hospital cost of primary THA is approximately USD 450 higher in patients with DDH compared with osteoarthritis. Increased severity of dysplasia (Crowe classification) was associated with higher costs.

Level of evidence: Level IV, economic and decision analyses. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A 40-year-old patient with Crowe 2 left hip dysplasia underwent THA. Note that the patient had a previous pelvic osteotomy and a femoral derotational osteotomy, which may increase the complexity and cost of the primary THA.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patients were selected who underwent THA for the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia. Patients with neuromuscular disease or no evidence of radiographic dysplasia were excluded. OA = osteoarthritis.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The cost of THA (hospitalization, operating room, total, prosthesis) was increased in patients with more severe dysplasia. OR = operating room.

References

    1. Boyle MJ, Frampton CM, Crawford HA. Early results of total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip compared with patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:386–390. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle MJ, Singleton N, Frampton CM, Muir D. Functional response to total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83:554–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06198.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bozic KJ, Morshed S, Silverstein MD, Rubash HE, Kahn JG. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopaedics. The case of alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:706–714. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00614. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:15–23. - PubMed
    1. Daigle ME, Weinstein AM, Katz JN, Losina E. The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review of published literature. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26:649–658. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2012.07.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms