Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 May-Jun;23(3):226-33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2014.12098.x.

Predictors of drinking and functional outcomes for men and women following inpatient alcohol treatment

Affiliations
Observational Study

Predictors of drinking and functional outcomes for men and women following inpatient alcohol treatment

Dawn E Sugarman et al. Am J Addict. 2014 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background and objectives: This prospective study uses path analytic models to examine baseline characteristics associated with both functioning and drinking outcomes 12 months after inpatient alcohol treatment.

Methods: Alcohol-dependent participants (N = 101) were recruited during inpatient alcohol treatment and assessed monthly 1 year after discharge.

Results: Alcohol severity was negatively associated with education and self-efficacy; marital status was positively associated with self-efficacy; and education and self-efficacy were negatively associated with drinking outcomes. Low alcohol severity, not having a depression diagnosis, and being married were associated with less social support impairment, which was in turn associated with better drinking outcomes. Having a history of sexual abuse did not influence drinking outcomes. However, having a history of sexual abuse was negatively associated with global functioning.

Conclusions and scientific significance: Drinking outcomes were associated with education, self-efficacy, social support, and diagnosis of depression at baseline; however, global functioning 1 year following treatment was primarily and negatively associated with sexual abuse history. Future treatment research should include measures of both functioning and drinking behavior outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Initial Path Model N.S. = non-significant; * p < .05; ** p < .01, *** p < .001
Figure 2
Figure 2
Path Analytic Model with Average Number of Drinks per Drinking Day as Outcome Standardized path coefficients appear on single-headed straight arrows. N.S. = non-significant; * p < .05; ** p < .01, *** p < .001
Figure 3
Figure 3
Path Analytic Model with Functioning as Outcome Standardized path coefficients appear on single-headed straight arrows. N.S. = non-significant; * p < .05; ** p < .01, *** p < .001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adamson SJ, Sellman JD, Frampton CMA. Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: A systematic review. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2009;36(1):75–86. - PubMed
    1. Kadden RM, Skerker PM. Treatment decision making and goal setting. In: McCrady BS, Epstein EE, editors. Addictions: A comprehensive guidebook. Oxford University Press; New York, NY US: 1999. pp. 216–231.
    1. Connors G, Maisto S, Zywiak W. Understanding relapse in the broader context of post-treatment functioning. Addiction. 1996;91(Suppl):S173–S189. - PubMed
    1. Kampman K, Volpicelli J, Alterman A, Cornish J, O’Brien C. Amantadine in the treatment of cocaine-dependent patients with severe withdrawal symptoms. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;157(12):2052–2054. - PubMed
    1. Bottlender M, Soyka M. Outpatient alcoholism treatment: Predictors of outcome after 3 years. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;80(1):83–89. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms