Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;113(3):424-32.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu100. Epub 2014 Apr 11.

Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice

A Sankar  1 , S R Johnson  2 , W S Beattie  3 , G Tait  3 , D N Wijeysundera  4
Affiliations

Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice

A Sankar et al. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Previous studies, which relied on hypothetical cases and chart reviews, have questioned the inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status (ASA-PS) scale. We therefore conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its inter-rater reliability and validity in clinical practice.

Methods: The cohort included all adult patients (≥18 yr) who underwent elective non-cardiac surgery at a quaternary-care teaching institution in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, from March 2010 to December 2011. We assessed inter-rater reliability by comparing ASA-PS scores assigned at the preoperative assessment clinic vs the operating theatre. We also assessed the validity of the ASA-PS scale by measuring its association with patients' preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes.

Results: The cohort included 10 864 patients, of whom 5.5% were classified as ASA I, 42.0% as ASA II, 46.7% as ASA III, and 5.8% as ASA IV. The ASA-PS score had moderate inter-rater reliability (κ 0.61), with 67.0% of patients (n=7279) being assigned to the same ASA-PS class in the clinic and operating theatre, and 98.6% (n=10 712) of paired assessments being within one class of each other. The ASA-PS scale was correlated with patients' age (Spearman's ρ, 0.23), Charlson comorbidity index (ρ=0.24), revised cardiac risk index (ρ=0.40), and hospital length of stay (ρ=0.16). It had moderate ability to predict in-hospital mortality (receiver-operating characteristic curve area 0.69) and cardiac complications (receiver-operating characteristic curve area 0.70).

Conclusions: Consistent with its inherent subjectivity, the ASA-PS scale has moderate inter-rater reliability in clinical practice. It also demonstrates validity as a marker of patients' preoperative health status.

Keywords: anaesthesiology; health status; reliability and validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Distribution of ASA-PS ratings in the operating theatre, within strata defined by ASA-PS rating in the preoperative assessment clinic.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941;2:281–4.
    1. Vogt AW, Henson LC. Unindicated preoperative testing: ASA physical status and financial implications. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:437–41. - PubMed
    1. Australian Government Department of Health and Aging. Medicare Benefits Schedule Book. Commonwealth of Australia; 2005.
    1. Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status score may be used as a comorbidity index in hip fracture surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:134–7. - PubMed
    1. Cullen DJ, Apolone G, Greenfield S, Guadagnoli E, Cleary P. ASA Physical Status and age predict morbidity after three surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 1994;220:3–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms