Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e93887.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093887. eCollection 2014.

Out-of-pocket payments, health care access and utilisation in south-eastern Nigeria: a gender perspective

Affiliations

Out-of-pocket payments, health care access and utilisation in south-eastern Nigeria: a gender perspective

Michael N Onah et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Out-of-pocket (OOP) payments have severe consequences for health care access and utilisation and are especially catastrophic for the poor. Although women comprise the majority of the poor in Nigeria and globally, the implications of OOP payments for health care access from a gender perspective have received little attention. This study seeks to fill this gap by using a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis to investigate the gendered impact of OOPs on healthcare utilisation in south-eastern Nigeria. 411 households were surveyed and six single-sex Focus Group Discussions conducted. This study confirmed the socioeconomic and demographic vulnerability of female-headed households (FHHs), which contributed to gender-based inter-household differences in healthcare access, cost burden, choices of healthcare providers, methods of funding healthcare and coping strategies. FHHs had higher cost burdens from seeking care and untreated morbidity than male-headed households (MHHs) with affordability as a reason for not seeking care. There is also a high utilisation of patent medicine vendors (PMVs) by both households (PMVs are drug vendors that are unregulated, likely to offer very low-quality treatment and do not have trained personnel). OOP payment was predominantly the means of healthcare payment for both households, and households spoke of the difficulties associated with repaying health-related debt with implications for the medical poverty trap. It is recommended that the removal of user fees, introduction of prepayment schemes, and regulating PMVs be considered to improve access and provide protection against debt for FHHs and MHHs. The vulnerability of widows is of special concern and efforts to improve their healthcare access and broader efforts to empower should be encouraged for them and other poor households.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Type of health care provider utilized.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cost burden and untreated morbidity (p<0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Affordability reasons for not seeking care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO (2010a) The world health report - Health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM, Pierson R, et al. (2010) How health insurance design affects access to care and costs, by income, in eleven countries. Health Affairs 29: 2323–2334. - PubMed
    1. You X, Kobayashi Y (2011) Determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditure in China. Applied health economics and health policy 9: 39–49. - PubMed
    1. Furuta M, Salway S (2006) Women's position within the household as a determinant of maternal health care use in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives: 17–27. - PubMed
    1. Omariba D, Boyle MH (2007) Family Structure and Child Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cross-National Effects of Polygyny. Journal of Marriage and Family 69: 528–543.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources