Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):186-92.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu212. Epub 2014 Apr 11.

Xpert MTB/RIF assay shortens airborne isolation for hospitalized patients with presumptive tuberculosis in the United States

Affiliations
Observational Study

Xpert MTB/RIF assay shortens airborne isolation for hospitalized patients with presumptive tuberculosis in the United States

Christopher K Lippincott et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: In the United States, individuals with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis are placed in airborne infection isolation (AII) and assessed by smear microscopy on 3 respiratory specimens collected 8-24 hours apart. Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) on 1, 2, or 3 specimens may be more efficient for determining AII discontinuation.

Methods: This single-center, observational cohort study of inpatients with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis enrolled adults with 1 or more sputum specimens submitted for smear microscopy. Smear microscopy and Xpert were performed on each sputum specimen. Clinicians were blinded to Xpert results. The primary endpoint was AII duration. Secondary endpoints were laboratory processing time, strategy-based tuberculosis detection, and sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Among 207 subjects, the median AII duration was 68.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 47.1-97.5) for smear microscopy compared with 20.8 hours (IQR, 16.8-32.0) for the 1-specimen Xpert, 41.2 hours (IQR, 26.6-54.8) for the 2-specimen Xpert, and 54.0 hours (IQR, 43.3-80.0) for the 3-specimen Xpert strategies (P ≤ .004). Median laboratory processing time for smear microscopy was 2.5 times as long as Xpert (P < .001). The 2- and 3-specimen Xpert and smear microscopy strategies captured all 6 tuberculosis cases. The 1-specimen Xpert strategy missed 1 case. No difference was observed between smear microscopy and Xpert in sensitivity or specificity for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Conclusions: Xpert-based strategies significantly reduced AII duration compared with the smear-based strategy. The 2-specimen Xpert strategy was most efficient in minimizing AII time while identifying all tuberculosis cases among individuals with presumptive tuberculosis in this low-burden setting.

Keywords: United States; Xpert; infection control; tuberculosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier curve displaying time from airborne infection isolation initiation to laboratory receipt of the first (n = 201), second (n = 185), and third (n = 166) respiratory specimen(s). Failed sputum inductions were used to determine specimen order regardless of whether an induction time was available. Failed sputum inductions contributed time data to this Kaplan-Meier curve only when the induction time was available (n = 6). Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier curve comparing Xpert MTB/RIF assay and smear microscopy laboratory processing time for successfully collected respiratory specimens (n = 546). Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier curve comparing airborne infection isolation duration for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay strategies on 1 specimen (n = 201), 2 specimens (n = 180), and 3 specimens (n = 148) to the smear microscopy–based strategy (n = 201). Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

References

    1. Dowdle WR. A strategic plan for the elimination of tuberculosis in the United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1989;38(suppl 3):1–25. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services,; 2013. Reported tuberculosis in the United States, 2012.
    1. Jensen PA, Lambert LA, Iademarco MF, Ridzon R. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care settings, 2005. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54:1–141. - PubMed
    1. Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:570–81. - PubMed
    1. Mathew P, Kuo YH, Vazirani B, Eng RH, Weinstein MP. Are three sputum acid-fast bacillus smears necessary for discontinuing tuberculosis isolation? J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3482–4. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types