Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Apr 14:15:129.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-129.

CASINO: surgical or nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy, a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

CASINO: surgical or nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy, a randomised controlled trial

Sarita van Geest et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Cervical radicular syndrome (CRS) due to a herniated disc can be safely treated by surgical decompression of the spinal root. In the vast majority of cases this relieves pain in the arm and restores function. However, conservative treatment also has a high chance on relieving symptoms. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of surgery versus prolonged conservative care during one year of follow-up, and to evaluate the timing of surgery. Predisposing factors in favour of one of the two treatments will be evaluated.

Methods/design: Patients with disabling radicular arm pain, suffering for at least 2 months, and an MRI-proven herniated cervical disc will be randomised to receive either surgery or prolonged conservative care with surgery if needed. The surgical intervention will be an anterior discectomy or a posterior foraminotomy that is carried out according to usual care. Surgery will take place within 2-4 weeks after randomisation. Conservative care starts immediately after randomisation. The primary outcome measure is the VAS for pain or tingling sensations in the arm one year after randomisation. In addition, timing of surgery will be studied by correlating the primary outcome to the duration of symptoms. Secondary outcome measures encompass quality of life, costs and perceived recovery. Predefined prognostic factors will be evaluated. The total follow-up period will cover two years. A sample size of 400 patients is needed. Statistical analysis will be performed using a linear mixed model which will be based on the 'intention to treat' principle. In addition, a new CRS questionnaire for patients will be developed, the Leiden Cervical Radicular Syndrome Functioning (LCRSF) scale.

Discussion: The outcome will contribute to better decision making for the treatment of cervical radicular syndrome.

Trial registration: NTR3504.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1990;117:325–335. - PubMed
    1. Salemi G, Savattieri G, Meneghini F. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a door-to-door survey in a Sicilian municipality. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 1996;93:184–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10629.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoss RE, Corbin KB, MacCarty CS, Love JG. Significance of symptoms and signs in localization of involved roots in cervcial disc protrusion. Neurology. 1999;7:673–683. - PubMed
    1. Bush K, Chaudhuri R, Hillier S, Penny J. The pathomorphologic changes that accompany the resolution of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study with repeat magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 1997;22:183–186. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199701150-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mochida K, Komori H, Okawa A, Muneta T, Haro H, Shinomiya K. Regression of cervical disc herniation observed on magnetic resonance images. Spine. 1998;23:990–995. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199805010-00005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources