Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;9(6):829-33.
doi: 10.4161/epi.28790. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

Validation of DNA methylation profiling in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 Microarray

Affiliations

Validation of DNA methylation profiling in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 Microarray

Sebastián Moran et al. Epigenetics. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

A formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sample usually yields highly degraded DNA, which limits the use of techniques requiring high-quality DNA, such as Infinium Methylation microarrays. To overcome this restriction, we have applied an FFPE restoration procedure consisting of DNA repair and ligation processes in a set of paired fresh-frozen (FF) and FFPE samples. We validated the FFPE results in comparison with matched FF samples, enabling us to use FFPE samples on the Infinium HumanMethylation450 Methylation array.

Keywords: 450K; DNA methylation; FFPE; epigenetics; infinium; methylation; microarray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. (A) Scatter plots of the first two principal components of variance, grouping samples on the basis of the DNA source (FFPE or FF), Array Position (Sentrix Position) and Array (SentrixID). (B) A representative example of the comparison of SNP values obtained from matched FF and FFPE samples, indicating correct matched FF-FFPE sample is being compared. (C) A comparison of the methylation values from paired FFPE and FF sample for tumor 17. (D) Percentage of CpG sites statistically significant among sample origin by ANOVA analysis.
None
Figure 2. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of a randomly selected 2% of CpGs from the array.

References

    1. Fatemi M, Pao MM, Jeong S, Gal-Yam EN, Egger G, Weisenberger DJ, Jones PA. Footprinting of mammalian promoters: use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e176. doi: 10.1093/nar/gni180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herman JG, Baylin SB. Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2042–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra023075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E, Goodman SN, Hidalgo OF, Vanaclocha V, Baylin SB, Herman JG. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1350–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011093431901. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rakyan VK, Beyan H, Down TA, Hawa MI, Maslau S, Aden D, Daunay A, Busato F, Mein CA, Manfras B, et al. Identification of type 1 diabetes-associated DNA methylation variable positions that precede disease diagnosis. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002300. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masliah E, Dumaop W, Galasko D, Desplats P. Distinctive patterns of DNA methylation associated with Parkinson disease: identification of concordant epigenetic changes in brain and peripheral blood leukocytes. Epigenetics. 2013;8:1030–8. doi: 10.4161/epi.25865. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources