Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014;93(2):135-45.
doi: 10.1159/000356240. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivates, %p2PSA, prostate health index and prostate dimension-adjusted related index in the detection of prostate cancer at first biopsy: an exploratory, prospective study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivates, %p2PSA, prostate health index and prostate dimension-adjusted related index in the detection of prostate cancer at first biopsy: an exploratory, prospective study

Luigi Mearini et al. Urol Int. 2014.

Abstract

Objective: To confirm the accuracy of serum proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives, percentage of p2PSA to free PSA (%p2PSA) and Prostate Health Index (PHI) and to test the value of prostate dimension-adjusted related index p2PSA density (p2PSAD), %p2PSA density (%p2PSAD) and PHI density (PHID) in discriminating between patients with and without prostate cancer (PCa).

Patients and methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 275 patients with a total PSA (tPSA) of 2-10 ng/ml who underwent initial prostate biopsy. Multivariate logistic regression models were complemented by predictive accuracy analysis.

Results: PCa was diagnosed in 31.2% of subjects. Median tPSA did not differ between groups, while PSA density (PSAD), percent free PSA (%fPSA), p2PSA, %p2PSA, PHI, p2PSAD, %p2PSAD and PHID (all p < 0.05) were different between men with and without PCa. Univariate accuracy analysis showed p2PSAD (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.71), %p2PSAD (AUC: 0.76) and PHID (AUC: 0.77) to be the most accurate predictors of PCa at biopsy, significantly outperforming tPSA (AUC: 0.54), PSAD (AUC: 0.68) and %fPSA (AUC: 0.59) (p ≤ 0.001). At multivariate logistic regression models, p2PSAD and PHID significantly increased the accuracy of the basal multivariate model (all p < 0.01). At 90% specificity, sensitivity for p2PSAD, %p2PSAD and PHID were 33.7, 43 and 40.7%, respectively. Spearman's rho coefficient analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between Gleason score, %p2PSA (r = 0.216, p = 0.046), PHI (r = 0.223, p = 0.039) and %p2PSAD (r = 0.205, p = 0.05).

Conclusions: Considering patients suited for initial prostate biopsy by a tPSA range of 2-10 ng/ml, PSA isoforms were confirmed to be strong predictors of PCa. The prostate dimension-adjusted PSA isoforms have been shown to differentiate between patients with or without PCa, with an AUC of 0.71-0.77, p2PSAD offering a gain in accuracy with respect to tPSA, %fPSA and PSAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources