Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2014 Aug;472(8):2317-24.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3613-y. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures: is arthroplasty safer than open reduction internal fixation?

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures: is arthroplasty safer than open reduction internal fixation?

Alan L Zhang et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Background: With technologic advances such as locked periarticular plating, hemiarthroplasty of the humeral head, and more recently reverse total shoulder replacement, surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures has become more commonplace. However, there is insufficient information regarding patient outcomes after surgery, such as the frequency of unplanned hospital readmissions and factors contributing to readmission.

Questions/purposes: We measured (1) the frequency of unplanned hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures, (2) the medical and surgical causes of readmission, and (3) the risk factors associated with unplanned readmissions.

Methods: The State Inpatient Database from seven different states was used to identify patients who underwent treatment for a proximal humerus fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty of the humeral head, or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from 2005 through 2010. The database was used to measure the 30-day and 90-day readmission rates and identify causes and risk factors for readmission. Multivariate modeling and a Cox proportional hazards model were used for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 27,017 patients were included with an overall 90-day readmission rate of 14% (15% for treatment with ORIF, 15% for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and 13% for hemiarthroplasty). The majority of readmissions were associated with medical diagnoses (75%), but treatment with ORIF was associated with the most readmissions from surgical complications, (29%) followed by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (20%) and hemiarthroplasty (16%) (p < 0.001). Risk of readmission was greater for patients who were female, African American, discharged to a nursing facility, or had Medicaid insurance.

Conclusions: As the majority of unplanned hospital readmissions were associated with medical diagnoses, it is important to consider patient medical comorbidities before surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures and during the postoperative care phase.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patients were selected from the State Inpatient Database using ICD-9 procedure codes. Proximal humerus fractures were selected after excluding patients with polytrauma and then stratified based on treatment with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty of the humeral head, or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The graph illustrates the frequency of hospital readmissions for patients with proximal humerus fractures treated by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) compared with hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Readmissions for hemiarthroplasty were less than for ORIF.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bozic KJ. Value-based healthcare and orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1004–1005. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2267-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bozic KJ, Maselli J, Pekow PS, Lindenauer PK, Vail TP, Auerbach AD. The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2643–2652. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01477. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Hróbjartsson A. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2013;7:70–78. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.114225. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:516–520. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18435. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burke NG, Kennedy J, Green C, Dodds MK, Mullett H. Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e250–e254. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms