Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;22(7):1716-22.
doi: 10.1002/oby.20757. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Role of child weight status and the relative reinforcing value of food in children's response to portion size increases

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Role of child weight status and the relative reinforcing value of food in children's response to portion size increases

Tanja V E Kral et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Food portion size is an important determinant of intake in children. It remains unknown if children's weight status and relative reinforcing value of food (RRVF) interact with portion size to affect intake.

Methods: In a randomized crossover design, 25 normal-weight and 25 obese children, ages 8-10 years, consumed dinner once a week for 3 weeks. At each dinner, the same meal was served, but the portion size of all foods (chicken nuggets, hash browns, ketchup, green beans, brownies) and a sugar-sweetened beverage (fruit punch) varied across conditions (100, 150, and 200%). Children's RRVF was assessed using a behavioral choice task.

Results: There was a significant main effect of portion size condition (P = 0.003) and weight status (P = 0.0005) and a nonsignificant trend for a portion size-by-weight status interaction (P = 0.108) on intake. Mean intakes across conditions (100, 150, and 200%) were 801 ± 57, 964 ± 58, and 873 ± 57 kcal for normal-weight children and 1041 ± 57, 1129 ± 57, and 1210 ± 57 kcal for obese children, respectively. Neither the main effect of RRVF status nor the condition-by-RRVF status interaction was significant (P > 0.48).

Conclusions: Environments that offer large portions of palatable foods affect all children's intake irrespective of their weight status or how reinforcing they find food to be.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram for subject enrollment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total energy intake (model-based means ± SEM) across portion size conditions for normal-weight (N = 25) and obese (N = 25) children.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative reinforcing value (%RRV; model-based means ± SEM) by food reinforcer and activity alternative across 5 trials for normal-weight (N = 25) and obese (N = 25) children
Figure 4
Figure 4
Total energy intake (model-based means ± SEM) across portion size conditions for children with a low RRVF (N = 30) and a high RRVF (N = 20).

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA. 2006;295(13):1549–55. - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):242–9. - PubMed
    1. Fisher JO, Kral TV. Super-size me: Portion size effects on young children’s eating. Physiol Behav. 2008;94(1):39–47. - PubMed
    1. Rolls BJ, Engell D, Birch LL. Serving portion size influences 5-year-old but not 3-year-old children’s food intakes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100(2):232–4. - PubMed
    1. Orlet Fisher J, Rolls BJ, Birch LL. Children’s bite size and intake of an entree are greater with large portions than with age-appropriate or self-selected portions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(5):1164–70. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources