Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;38(10):1659-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes?

Elizabeth Joanne Gifford  1 , Lindsey Morgan Eldred  2 , Allison Vernerey  2 , Frank Allen Sloan  2
Affiliations

How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes?

Elizabeth Joanne Gifford et al. Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Parental substance use is a risk factor for child maltreatment. Family drug treatment courts (FDTCs) have emerged in the United States as a policy option to treat the underlying condition and promote family preservation. This study examines the effectiveness of FDTCs in North Carolina on child welfare outcomes. Data come from North Carolina records from child protection services, court system, and birth records. Three types of parental participation in a FDTC are considered: referral, enrolling, and completing an FDTC. The sample includes 566 children who were placed into foster care and whose parents participated in a FDTC program. Findings indicate that children of parents who were referred but did not enroll or who enrolled but did not complete had longer stays in foster care than children of completers. Reunification rates for children of completers were also higher. Outcomes for children in the referred and enrolled groups did not differ in the multivariate analyses. While effective substance use treatment services for parents may help preserve families, future research should examine factors for improving participation and completion rates as well as factors involved in scaling programs so that more families are served.

Keywords: Child welfare; Family drug treatment court; Foster care; Parental substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description of Data Set Linking
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American University School of Public Affairs BJA Drug court technical assistance/clearinghouse project summary of drug court activity by state and county juvenile/family drug courts. 2012 Nov 30; Retrieved from http://www.american.edu.
    1. Ashford J. Treating substance-Abusing parents: A study of the Pima County family drug court approach. Juvenile and Family Court Journal. 2004;55:27–37.
    1. Bambrough S, Shaw M, Kershaw S. The Family Drug and Alcohol Court service in London: a new way of doing Care Proceedings. Journal of Social Work Practice. 2013:1–14.
    1. Barnard M, McKeganey N. The impact of parental problem drug use on children: what is the problem and what can be done to help? Addiction. 2004;99:552–559. - PubMed
    1. Barth R, Lloyd E. Five-year developmental outcomes for young children remaining in foster care, returned home, or adopted. In: Fernandez E, Barth RP, editors. How does foster care work? International evidence on outcomes. Jessica Kingsley; London, England: 2010.

Publication types

MeSH terms