Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr-Jun;10(2):231-40.
doi: 10.4161/org.28816. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Tuning cell fate: from insights to vertebrate regeneration

Affiliations
Review

Tuning cell fate: from insights to vertebrate regeneration

Daisuke Kami et al. Organogenesis. 2014 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Epigenetic interventions are required to induce reprogramming from one cell type to another. At present, various cellular reprogramming methods such as somatic cell nuclear transfer, cell fusion, and direct reprogramming using transcription factors have been reported. In particular, direct reprogramming from somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has been achieved using defined factors that play important epigenetic roles. Although the mechanisms underlying cellular reprogramming and vertebrate regeneration, including appendage regeneration, remain unknown, dedifferentiation occurs at an early phase in both the events, and both events are contrasting with regard to cell death. We compared the current status of changes in cell fate of iPSCs with that of vertebrate regeneration and suggested that substantial insights into vertebrate regeneration should be helpful for safe applications of iPSCs to medicine.

Keywords: Dedifferentiation; Direct Conversion; Pluripotency; Primed Conversion; Reprogramming; Transcription Factors; Vertebrate Regeneration; induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Vertebrate regeneration in mouse neonates hearts.
None
Figure 2. Scheme of cell fate changes based on Waddington’s epigenetic landscape. Direct reprogramming is the reversion of terminally differentiated cells such as fibroblasts to a pluripotent state. Direct conversion is the alteration from one cell type to another, such as fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes. Dedifferentiation is defined as a reversion of specialized phenotypes into an undifferentiated state. Transdetermination is the switching of somatic stem/progenitor cells from one determined state to another closely related state.,
None
Figure 3. Study design of nuclear reprogramming Transcriptional factor (TF)-mediated reprogramming (upper left); reprogramming TFs such as Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) are introduced into iPSCs from somatic cells. Cell fusion (upper right); two or more different types of cells are fused using methods such as electrical cell fusion, polyethylene glycol cell fusion, or Sendai virus-induced cell fusion. Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT; lower); nuclei from donor cells are transferred into enucleated oocytes. Blastocysts derived from SCNT-oocytes can then be cultured as nuclear transfer-embryonic stem cells (NT-ESCs) or can be implanted into pseudopregnant mice to produce offspring.
None
Figure 4. Cardiac differentiation of OSKM-mediated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) via primed conversion (A) Phase contrast microscopic view of OSKM-mediated MEFs 14 d after OSKM infection. OSKM-mediated MEFs were differentiated into cardiomyocytes. (B) Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of gene expression. (C) Fluorescent microscopic view with immunofluorescent staining of OSKM-mediated MEFs, which were stained with DAPI, OCT4, Gata4, and α-actinin antibodies.

References

    1. Poss KD. Advances in understanding tissue regenerative capacity and mechanisms in animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:710–22. doi: 10.1038/nrg2879. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stocum DL, Cameron JA. Looking proximally and distally: 100 years of limb regeneration and beyond. Dev Dyn. 2011;240:943–68. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22553. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Song F, Li B, Stocum DL. Amphibians as research models for regenerative medicine. Organogenesis. 2010;6:141–50. doi: 10.4161/org.6.3.12039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar A, Godwin JW, Gates PB, Garza-Garcia AA, Brockes JP. Molecular basis for the nerve dependence of limb regeneration in an adult vertebrate. Science. 2007;318:772–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1147710. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kragl M, Knapp D, Nacu E, Khattak S, Maden M, Epperlein HH, Tanaka EM. Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration. Nature. 2009;460:60–5. doi: 10.1038/nature08152. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources