Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study
- PMID: 24737141
- DOI: 10.1007/s40368-014-0116-1
Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate and compare retention and caries occurance following placement of Clinpro and FUJI VII fissure sealants, by two different techniques simultaneously in unsealed, contralateral young permanent molars of 7- to 10-year-old children affected by mild to moderate dental fluorosis at various recall intervals of 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Study design: 80 schoolchildren with mild to moderate dental fluorosis were assigned to Group A and Group B with 40 children in each group. In Group A Clinpro fissure sealant and in Group B Fuji VII fissure sealant was used. In both the groups fissure sealants were applied by conventional fissure sealant technique (CST) on one side and enameloplasty sealant technique (EST) on the other side of the same arch. The applied fissure sealants were evaluated clinically for retention and caries incidence.
Results: Clinpro fissure sealant showed a retention rate of 95% when compared with Fuji VII (57.5%) at the end of 12 months, which was statistically significant. Regarding techniques, EST showed better results than CST in both the groups.
Statistics: Comparison of groups with respect to retention and techniques at different time periods was performed using Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). Comparison of different time periods with respect to retention and technique in all the groups was performed using Wilcoxon matched pairs test by ranks (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Clinpro fissure sealant showed better retention at all treatment intervals, when compared with Fuji VII. Further follow-up is required to study the efficacy of the fissure sealant placement techniques.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):151-8. doi: 10.2341/11-435-C. Epub 2012 Oct 23. Oper Dent. 2013. PMID: 23092148 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study.Indian J Dent Res. 2012 May-Jun;23(3):320-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.102214. Indian J Dent Res. 2012. PMID: 23059566
-
Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Feb;143(2):115-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0121. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012. PMID: 22298552 Clinical Trial.
-
Glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: review of literature.Int Dent J. 2002 Apr;52(2):67-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2002.tb00602.x. Int Dent J. 2002. PMID: 12013252 Review.
-
Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):393-414. Pediatr Dent. 2002. PMID: 12412954 Review.
Cited by
-
Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars.Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 27;14(7):1646. doi: 10.3390/ma14071646. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33801674 Free PMC article.
-
The clinical effects of laser preparation of tooth surfaces for fissure sealants placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0892-4. BMC Oral Health. 2019. PMID: 31477081 Free PMC article.
-
A concise review of dental sealants in caries management.Front Oral Health. 2023 Apr 17;4:1180405. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1180405. eCollection 2023. Front Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37138858 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials