Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 1;120(15):2308-15.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.28724. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Costs and benefits of an organized fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in the United States

Affiliations

Costs and benefits of an organized fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in the United States

Gery P Guy Jr et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Despite clear recommendations and evidence linking colorectal cancer screening to lower incidence and mortality, > 40% of adults are not up to date with screening. Existing domestic and international models of organized cancer screening programs have been effective in increasing screening rates. Implementing an organized, evidence-based, national screening program may be an effective approach to increasing screening rates.

Methods: In the current study, the authors estimated the initial investment required and the cost per person screened of a nationwide fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening program among adults aged 50 years to 75 years.

Results: The initial additional investment required was estimated at $277.9 to $318.2 million annually, with an estimated 8.7 to 9.4 million individuals screened at a cost of $32 to $39 per person screened. The program was estimated to prevent 2900 to 3100 deaths annually.

Conclusions: The results of the current study indicate that implementing a national screening program would make a substantial public health impact at a moderate cost per person screened. Results from this analysis may provide useful information for understanding the public health benefit of an organized screening delivery system and the potential resources required to implement a nationwide colorectal cancer screening program, and help guide decisions about program planning, design, and implementation.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; early detection; health economics; public health; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

Dr. Pignone’s work on the current study was supported by an Inter-agency Personnel Agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
First intervention design of the colorectal cancer screening program is shown. FIT indicates fecal immunochemical test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Second intervention design of the colorectal cancer screening program is shown. FIT indicates fecal immunochemical test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2010 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2013. [Accessed February 25, 2014]. www.cdc.gov/uscs.
    1. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekwueme DU, Guy GP, Li C, Rim SH, Parelkar P, Chen SC. The health burden and economic costs of cutaneous melanoma mortality by race/ethnicity–United States, 2000 to 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(5 suppl 1):S133–S143. - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. [Accessed March 2, 2013]. uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscolo.htm.
    1. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Brenner H. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:88–100. - PMC - PubMed