A biomechanical comparison of the vertical jump, power clean, and jump squat
- PMID: 24738710
- DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2014.908320
A biomechanical comparison of the vertical jump, power clean, and jump squat
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the kinetics, kinematics, and muscle activation patterns of the countermovement jump, the power clean, and the jump squat with the expectation of gaining a better understanding of the mechanism of transfer from the power clean to the vertical jump. Ground reaction forces, electromyography, and joint angle data were collected from 20 trained participants while they performed the three movements. Relative to the power clean, the kinematics of the jump squat were more similar to those of the countermovement jump. The order in which the ankle, knee, and hip began extending, as well as the subsequent pattern of extension, was different between the power clean and countermovement jump. The electromyography data demonstrated significant differences in the relative timing of peak activations in all muscles, the maximum activation of the rectus femoris and biceps femoris, and in the activation/deactivation patterns of the vastus medialis and rectus femoris. The greatest rate of force development during the upward phase of these exercises was generated during the power clean (17,254 [Formula: see text]), which was significantly greater than both the countermovement jump (3836 [Formula: see text]) and jump squat (3517 [Formula: see text]) conditions (P < .001, [Formula: see text]).
Keywords: electromyography; kinematic; kinetic; rate of force development; weightlifting.
Similar articles
-
Characteristics of lower extremity work during the impact phase of jumping and weightlifting.J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Dec;27(12):3225-32. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828ddf19. J Strength Cond Res. 2013. PMID: 23442272
-
Load-Power Relationship During a Countermovement Jump: A Joint Level Analysis.J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):955-961. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002432. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. PMID: 29334580
-
Influence of lumbar spine extension on vertical jump height during maximal squat jumping.J Sports Sci. 2014;32(7):642-51. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.845680. Epub 2013 Oct 9. J Sports Sci. 2014. PMID: 24102076
-
Contributions to the understanding of gait control.Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4823. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 24814597 Review.
-
Squatting kinematics and kinetics and their application to exercise performance.J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Dec;24(12):3497-506. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bac2d7. J Strength Cond Res. 2010. PMID: 20182386 Review.
Cited by
-
Training for Muscular Strength: Methods for Monitoring and Adjusting Training Intensity.Sports Med. 2021 Oct;51(10):2051-2066. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01488-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34101157 Review.
-
Weightlifting Overhead Pressing Derivatives: A Review of the Literature.Sports Med. 2019 Jun;49(6):867-885. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01096-8. Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30924081 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Examination of a lumbar spine biomechanical model for assessing axial compression, shear, and bending moment using selected Olympic lifts.J Orthop. 2015 May 18;13(3):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.04.002. eCollection 2016 Sep. J Orthop. 2015. PMID: 27408480 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Expertise on Muscle Activity during the Hang Power Clean and Hang Power Snatch Compared to Snatch and Clean Pulls - An Explorative Analysis.J Sports Sci Med. 2023 Dec 1;22(4):778-789. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2023.778. eCollection 2023 Dec. J Sports Sci Med. 2023. PMID: 38045750 Free PMC article.
-
Can 3 mg·kg-1 of Caffeine Be Used as An Effective Nutritional Supplement to Enhance the Effects of Resistance Training in Rugby Union Players?Nutrients. 2021 Sep 25;13(10):3367. doi: 10.3390/nu13103367. Nutrients. 2021. PMID: 34684368 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources