Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Nov;84(6):1054-61.
doi: 10.2319/111913-845.1. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

Effects of third-order torque on frictional force of self-ligating brackets

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of third-order torque on frictional force of self-ligating brackets

Takeshi Muguruma et al. Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of third-order torque on frictional properties of self-ligating brackets (SLBs).

Materials and methods: Three SLBs (two passive and one active) and three archwires (0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium, and 0.017 × 0.025-inch and 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel) were used. Static friction was measured by drawing archwires though bracket slots with four torque levels (0°, 10°, 20°, 30°), using a mechanical testing machine (n = 10). A conventional stainless-steel bracket was used for comparison. RESULTS were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Contact between the bracket and wire was studied using a scanning electron microscope.

Results: In most bracket-wire combinations, increasing the torque produced a significant increase in static friction. Most SLB-wire combinations at all torques produced less friction than that from the conventional bracket. Active-type SLB-wire combinations showed higher friction than that from passive-type SLB-wire combinations in most conditions. When increasing the torque, more contact between the wall of a bracket slot and the edge of a wire was observed for all bracket types.

Conclusions: Increasing torque when using SLBs causes an increase in friction, since contact between the bracket slot wall and the wire edge becomes greater; the design of brackets influences static friction.

Keywords: Archwire; Friction; SEM; Self-ligating brackets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Photographs of three self-ligating brackets and the conventional bracket used in the present study. (a) Damon Q. (b) SmartClip. (c) In-Ovation R. (d) Mini Uni-Twin.
Figure 1.
Photographs of three self-ligating brackets and the conventional bracket used in the present study. (a) Damon Q. (b) SmartClip. (c) In-Ovation R. (d) Mini Uni-Twin.
Figure 2. Friction testing system (a, b) Custom-fabricated frictional testing device attached to universal testing machine. (c, d) Bracket-mounting device. (e) Stainless-steel plate that could apply third-order torque to the bracket. A, grip; B, bracket-wire combination specimen; C, stainless-steel plate; D, weight (150 g); E, angle measurement device.
Figure 2.
Friction testing system (a, b) Custom-fabricated frictional testing device attached to universal testing machine. (c, d) Bracket-mounting device. (e) Stainless-steel plate that could apply third-order torque to the bracket. A, grip; B, bracket-wire combination specimen; C, stainless-steel plate; D, weight (150 g); E, angle measurement device.
Figure 3. Static frictional forces measured at four different bracket torques for the three self-ligating brackets and the conventional bracket with the nickel-titanium wire and the stainless-steel wires.
Figure 3.
Static frictional forces measured at four different bracket torques for the three self-ligating brackets and the conventional bracket with the nickel-titanium wire and the stainless-steel wires.
Figure 4. Static frictional forces for the three self-ligating brackets and the conventional bracket with the nickel-titanium wire and the stainless-steel wires. DQ indicates Damon Q; SC, SmartClip; IO, In-Ovation R; MU(L), Mini Uni-Twin ligated with ligature wire; MU(E), Mini Uni-Twin ligated with elastomeric module.
Figure 4.
Static frictional forces for the three self-ligating brackets and the conventional bracket with the nickel-titanium wire and the stainless-steel wires. DQ indicates Damon Q; SC, SmartClip; IO, In-Ovation R; MU(L), Mini Uni-Twin ligated with ligature wire; MU(E), Mini Uni-Twin ligated with elastomeric module.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned Damon Q bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.
Figure 5.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned Damon Q bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned SmartClip bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.
Figure 6.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned SmartClip bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned In-Ovation R bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.
Figure 7.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned In-Ovation R bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.
Figure 8. Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned Mini Uni-Twin bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.
Figure 8.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of cross-sectioned Mini Uni-Twin bracket and each wire combination. (a–d) 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium wire. (e–h) 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (i–l) 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel wire. (a, e, i) Wire torque at 0°. (b, f, j) Wire torque at 10°. (c, g, k) Wire torque at 20°. (d, h, l) Wire torque at 30°.

References

    1. Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:442–447. - PubMed
    1. Bazakidou E, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Jr, Sinha P. Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:138–144. - PubMed
    1. Redlich M, Mayer Y, Harari D, Lewinstein I. In vitro study of frictional force during sliding mechanics of “reduced-friction” brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:69–73. - PubMed
    1. Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2™ vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:480–485. - PubMed
    1. Harradine N. Self-ligating brackets increase treatment efficiency. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:10–18. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources